2022
DOI: 10.3390/fishes7040210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Insight into the Feeding Ecology of Serranus scriba, a Shallow Water Mesopredator in the Northern Adriatic Sea, with a Non-Destructive Method

Abstract: Serranus scriba is a common member of the coastal fish community in the Adriatic Sea, but knowledge about its feeding ecology is scarce. The aim of this paper is to present new evidence about its food preferences and feeding habits. An innovative non-destructive method of fecal pellet analysis was used for this study. This method does not require sacrificing specimens and the fish can be released back into the sea alive after the laboratory work. The results demonstrated that S. scriba mainly preys on decapods… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 84 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Why P. luculentus and C. bulbifrons used anvils to handle crabs that were similar in size to their gapes (Figures 1a and 2a) is a question that remains to be answered. Their goals may have been to (a) break the exoskeleton to more easily access the flesh and/or make crabs more compressible prior to ingestion (Mihalitsis & Bellwood, 2017), (b) break off the legs and chelipeds to remove less profitable parts (parts providing less energy per unit handling time) and indigestible parts (Lokovšek et al, 2022) and/or reduce the circumference of crabs that extend their legs and chelipeds when bitten (Field, 1990), (c) reduce the size of crabs that are too large to be swallowed whole (Biljlsma & de Roder, 1991; Jayne et al, 2002) or (d) incapacitate or kill crabs to minimise the risk of injury from struggling and dangerous prey (Wall & Shine, 2007). It is possible that only a few individuals in the population use anvils as a handling mechanism (Dunn, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Why P. luculentus and C. bulbifrons used anvils to handle crabs that were similar in size to their gapes (Figures 1a and 2a) is a question that remains to be answered. Their goals may have been to (a) break the exoskeleton to more easily access the flesh and/or make crabs more compressible prior to ingestion (Mihalitsis & Bellwood, 2017), (b) break off the legs and chelipeds to remove less profitable parts (parts providing less energy per unit handling time) and indigestible parts (Lokovšek et al, 2022) and/or reduce the circumference of crabs that extend their legs and chelipeds when bitten (Field, 1990), (c) reduce the size of crabs that are too large to be swallowed whole (Biljlsma & de Roder, 1991; Jayne et al, 2002) or (d) incapacitate or kill crabs to minimise the risk of injury from struggling and dangerous prey (Wall & Shine, 2007). It is possible that only a few individuals in the population use anvils as a handling mechanism (Dunn, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%