2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2010.10.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An insight into the feeding ecology of deep-sea canyon nematodes — Results from field observations and the first in-situ 13C feeding experiment in the Nazaré Canyon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gambi and Danovaro (2016) found a general dominance of deposit feeders in the Whittard Canyon, as also found by Ingels et al (2011c) and Amaro et al (2016). Canyon sediments are also generally characterised by a more complex nematode trophic complexity compared to slope systems, with a more even distribution between the different feeding types, a likely consequence of the greater variety of food sources available in canyon sediments and enhanced niche exploitation (Ingels et al 2011b). Amaro et al (2016) and Gambi and Danovaro (2016) also show that predatory species are less prevalent in the Whittard Canyon than on the adjacent slope, although it has been shown for the Nazare Canyon that predatory and scavenging species can be more abundant and can represent greater biomass in the canyon compared to the slope (Ingels et al , 2011b.…”
Section: Adaptation Of Meiofauna To Canyon Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Gambi and Danovaro (2016) found a general dominance of deposit feeders in the Whittard Canyon, as also found by Ingels et al (2011c) and Amaro et al (2016). Canyon sediments are also generally characterised by a more complex nematode trophic complexity compared to slope systems, with a more even distribution between the different feeding types, a likely consequence of the greater variety of food sources available in canyon sediments and enhanced niche exploitation (Ingels et al 2011b). Amaro et al (2016) and Gambi and Danovaro (2016) also show that predatory species are less prevalent in the Whittard Canyon than on the adjacent slope, although it has been shown for the Nazare Canyon that predatory and scavenging species can be more abundant and can represent greater biomass in the canyon compared to the slope (Ingels et al , 2011b.…”
Section: Adaptation Of Meiofauna To Canyon Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Canyon sediments are also generally characterised by a more complex nematode trophic complexity compared to slope systems, with a more even distribution between the different feeding types, a likely consequence of the greater variety of food sources available in canyon sediments and enhanced niche exploitation (Ingels et al 2011b). Amaro et al (2016) and Gambi and Danovaro (2016) also show that predatory species are less prevalent in the Whittard Canyon than on the adjacent slope, although it has been shown for the Nazare Canyon that predatory and scavenging species can be more abundant and can represent greater biomass in the canyon compared to the slope (Ingels et al , 2011b. Local conditions and environmental heterogeneities on a cm or mm scale are likely the cause for such discrepancies since canyon nematode communities tend to be regulated by processes that operate on very small spatial scales Rosli et al this issue).…”
Section: Adaptation Of Meiofauna To Canyon Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yet, to date there is no evidence that these food sources are of substantial importance to maintain the metabolic demands of these organisms. Food experiments with bacteria, cyanobacteria, and diatoms have been performed in different deep-sea locations but have always resulted in a very low uptake by nematodes (Witte et al 2003b;Moens et al 2005;Ingels et al in press (a and b)). Both the fact that freeze-dried detritus was used and that often a time-lagged response occurred led to the suggestion that nematode uptake could be indirect, through indigenous bacteria or other microheterotrophs growing on the added detritus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a comparable direct and considerable ingestion of phytodetritus by protozoan species and several macrofaunal taxa was measured (Levin et al 1999;Moodley et al 2000;Aberle and Witte 2003), the shortterm uptake by nematodes was limited (Moodley et al 2002;Ingels et al in press (a)) or absent (Nomaki et al 2005;Sweetman and Witte 2008;Ingels et al in press (b)). Occasionally a time delay of around 3 weeks prior to a limited uptake was observed for nematodes (Witte et al 2003b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%