2018
DOI: 10.1063/1.5017236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An instrument for in situ time-resolved X-ray imaging and diffraction of laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing processes

Abstract: In situ X-ray-based measurements of the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing process produce unique data for model validation and improved process understanding. Synchrotron X-ray imaging and diffraction provide high resolution, bulk sensitive information with sufficient sampling rates to probe melt pool dynamics as well as phase and microstructure evolution. Here, we describe a laboratory-scale LPBF test bed designed to accommodate diffraction and imaging experiments at a synchrotron X-ray so… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This X-ray probe position simplifies analysis by precluding diffracted intensity contributions from flying spatter or powder particles. At the same time, since the melt depression and melt pool extend up to at least 100 μm below the powder substrate interface 15,49 [Also see Supplemental Fig. S3], the volume probed provides relevant information about the phase and microstructural evolution within a localized region undergoing melting and resolidification.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This X-ray probe position simplifies analysis by precluding diffracted intensity contributions from flying spatter or powder particles. At the same time, since the melt depression and melt pool extend up to at least 100 μm below the powder substrate interface 15,49 [Also see Supplemental Fig. S3], the volume probed provides relevant information about the phase and microstructural evolution within a localized region undergoing melting and resolidification.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The entire setup is enclosed in a vacuum chamber with beryllium windows to allow transmission of X-rays and is filled with argon to prevent oxidation of the powder during the LPBF process. Further details about the system can be found in Calta et al 49 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Please note that these are only rough estimates as heat fluxes continuously change with time-varying temperature fields. Moreover, this estimation of is an underestimation as even higher temperature gradients are observed in the vicinity of melt zone by melt-pool simulation studies [ 37 ]. Nevertheless, it can be observed from these estimates that indeed heat losses through convection and radiation are orders of magnitude lower near the melt zone than those by conduction, as argued by Paul et al [ 19 ].…”
Section: Thermal Modeling Simplifications and Comparison Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, as the cavity is too deep and the pore fails to float up before solidification, the pore is retained deep in the base (King et al, 2014;Matthews et al, 2016). And also, Calta et al (2018) performed in-situ X-ray-based measurements of LPBF process using the synchrotron X-ray imaging and diffraction. They revealed the formation of keyhole pores along the melt track due to vapor recoil forces by imaging the melt pool dynamics.…”
Section: Melting-solidification Phenomena 31 Melting-solidification mentioning
confidence: 99%