2015
DOI: 10.5186/aasfm.2015.4017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An integral operator preserving s-Carleson measure on the unit ball

Abstract: Abstract. We establish an integral operator which preserves s-Carleson measure on the unit ball. As an application, we characterize the distance from Bloch-type functions to the analytic function space F (p, q, s) on the ball.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our method relies on a popular decomposition of which is used repeatedly in many papers. See Theorem 1 in [12] for instance. The first two authors obtain the same estimate on the unit ball by an analogue method, see [11].…”
Section: Lemma 22 (Lemma 22 In [5]) Supposementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our method relies on a popular decomposition of which is used repeatedly in many papers. See Theorem 1 in [12] for instance. The first two authors obtain the same estimate on the unit ball by an analogue method, see [11].…”
Section: Lemma 22 (Lemma 22 In [5]) Supposementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some essential descriptions of HCs presented later, depend heavily on the following general invariance for the modified Carleson measures (cf. [, Theorem 1]). Theorem Suppose {0truep,η()0,n+1n;0truea>trueprefixmax{}1+η2,1+η+n(1p)2;0trueb>1+η2.For any Lebesgue measurable function f on Bn let If |ffalse(zfalse)|2()1|z|2ηdvfalse(zfalse) belongs to CMp, then false|sans-serifTa,bffalse(zfalse)|2()1|z|22a+ηdvfalse(zfalse) also belongs to CMp.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our main results can be regarded as a generalization of [6] and [20,21] in the Békollé weights settings. Inspired by the ideas of [7] and [26], we mainly apply the Bergman projection in [1] and employ some results on Carleson measures in [4,5,19] to overcome the obstacles. In [21], Saukko's proof of difference when 0 < q < p < ∞ is base on the atomic decomposition and interpolation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%