An Integrated Adaptation and Mitigation Framework for Developing Agricultural Research: Synergies and Trade-Offs

Abstract

SUMMARYGlobal food security is under threat by climate change, and the impacts fall disproportionately on resource-poor small producers. With the goal of making agricultural and food systems more climate-resilient, this paper presents an adaptation and mitigation framework. A road map for further agricultural research is proposed, based on the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security. We propose a holistic, integrated approach that takes into account trade-offs and feedbacks between interventions. We divide the agenda into four research areas, three tackling risk management, accelerated adaptation and emissions mitigation, and the fourth facilitating adoption of research outputs. After reviewing specific technical, agronomic and policy options for reducing climate change vulnerability, we acknowledge that science and good-faith recommendations do not necessarily translate into effective and timely actions. We therefore outline impediments to behavioural change and propose that future research overcomes these obstacles by linking the right institutions, instruments and scientific outputs. Food security research must go beyond its focus on production to also examine food access and utilization issues. Finally, we conclude that urgent action is needed despite the uncertainties, trade-offs and challenges.

Mitigating N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from soil: from patching leaks to transformative action

“…At present, interactions and conflicts between N 2 O mitigation strategies and solutions proposed to address other agronomic, environmental or socioeconomic problems remain insufficiently explored. Therefore, it is important to identify where synergies and tradeoffs can be found, by collaborating with scientists that specialize in other aspects of agroecology, as well as with scientists that develop methods to facilitate transdisciplinary research and engage stakeholders, tools for trade-off analysis, and approaches to deal with complex systems (Klapwijk et al, 2014;van Mil et al, 2014;Jarvis et al, 2011). In practice, this could include combining management scenarios in field trials and modelling efforts; facilitating the transfer of the data they produce by collaborating on consistent data and reporting protocols, and standardized, centralized databases; contributing to build integrated bio-physical and socio-economic models; and conducting metastudies placing N 2 O-related outcomes among other environmental and socio-economic indicators, which in turn can feed back into the design of N 2 O emission reduction research (Fig.…”

Climate-smart agriculture global research agenda: scientific basis for action

“…During the few past decades, crop yields have been reduced because of warming [5], and the results of modelling studies suggest that climate change will reduce food crop yield potential, particularly in many tropical and midlatitude countries [6][7][8][9]. Rising atmospheric CO 2 concentrations will decrease food and forage quality [10].…”

Climate-smart soil water and nutrient management options in semiarid West Africa: a review of evidence and analysis of stone bunds and zaï techniques

“…Integrating climate change adaptation and mitigation may ensure food security and also reduce agriculture ecological footprint. Adaptation is a priority for smallholder farmers, who will pursue mitigation when it brings benefits without increasing costs and risks [5].…”