2000
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2000.9251020x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Integrated Approach of Breeding and Maintaining an Elite Cultivar of Snap Bean

Abstract: to compensate for the declining native variability by deliberate maintenance. This study is an attempt to describe a functional breeding andMajor breeding objectives in snap bean (Phaseolus maintaining program of intraselection in a traditional snap bean vulgaris L.) concern the development of cultivars com-(Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivar. The program was applied in three bining high productivity, stable yields, earliness, pest stages. The first thing examined was the existing genetic variability of source ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Duvick (2005) claimed that the target of densityneutral hybrids is accomplishable and such hybrids would optimize the resource use efficiency, particularly under drought-prone conditions. The capacity of the honeycomb procedure to successfully select for productivity at the typical farming densities was validated by experimental reports in other crops as well, such as snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) (Traka-Mavrona et al 2000), tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) (Christakis and Fasoulas 2002), in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) (Missaoui et al 2005), in bread wheat (Tokatlidis et al 2006), in rice (Oryza sativa L.) (Ntanos and Roupakias 2001), and in cotton (Batzios et al 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Duvick (2005) claimed that the target of densityneutral hybrids is accomplishable and such hybrids would optimize the resource use efficiency, particularly under drought-prone conditions. The capacity of the honeycomb procedure to successfully select for productivity at the typical farming densities was validated by experimental reports in other crops as well, such as snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) (Traka-Mavrona et al 2000), tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) (Christakis and Fasoulas 2002), in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) (Missaoui et al 2005), in bread wheat (Tokatlidis et al 2006), in rice (Oryza sativa L.) (Ntanos and Roupakias 2001), and in cotton (Batzios et al 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Honeycomb intra-cultivar selection in wheat (Fasoula 1990;Tokatlidis et al , 2006, maize (Tokatlidis 2000), cotton (Fasoulas 2000;Tokatlidis et al 2008bTokatlidis et al , 2011 and soybean Boerma 2005, 2007) succeeded in upgrading cultivars for yield, stability and important agronomic traits related to product quality and tolerance to stresses. Other reports for successful honeycomb selection exist in cotton, lentil, maize, rice, snap bean and tomato (Traka-Mavrona et al 2000;Batzios et al 2001;Ntanos and Roupakias 2001;Tokatlidis et al 2001Tokatlidis et al , 2005Christakis and Fasoulas 2002;Vlachostergios et al 2011). Honeycomb breeding has led to the development and registration of 18 elite soybean germplasm lines with superior agronomic and seed traits (Fasoula et al 2007a, b, c).…”
Section: Discussion and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wide ranges of variation displayed by all the traits emphasize strongly the possibilities for selection within the landraces because many of them are actually mixture of lines. Bean mixtures of different types according to some characteristics such as seed colour and pattern are often seen in farmer fields and markets in many countries (Kaplan 1981, Traka-Mavrona et al 2000, Rodin˜o 2001, Piergiovanni et al (in press)). In the present research each landrace was evaluated according to its average value for each quantitative trait and the seed was described according to the most representative type in the mixtures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%