2020
DOI: 10.3906/bot-1912-34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An integrated approach to the study of Hypericum occurring in Sicily

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of the components in the extracts from H. perforatum flowers resulted phloroglucinols (hyperforins) and flavonols (myricetin derivates, rutin, myricitrin, hyperoside, isoquercitrin, quercitrin, and quercetin), adding up from 68% to 84% of total identified phenols. This feature is typical of H. perforatum, and allows a rather precise separation of this species from many others, even if taxonomically close [25,30].…”
Section: Phytochemical Compositionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The majority of the components in the extracts from H. perforatum flowers resulted phloroglucinols (hyperforins) and flavonols (myricetin derivates, rutin, myricitrin, hyperoside, isoquercitrin, quercitrin, and quercetin), adding up from 68% to 84% of total identified phenols. This feature is typical of H. perforatum, and allows a rather precise separation of this species from many others, even if taxonomically close [25,30].…”
Section: Phytochemical Compositionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…This is due to the new and different species delimitation adopted in the updated checklist of Italy (Bartolucci et al 2018;Galasso et al 2018) and to the increased knowledge of plant taxonomy in recent years (e.g. Astuti et al 2017;Domina et al 2017;Giovino et al 2020).…”
Section: An Updated Cwr/whp Checklist For Italymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reliable molecular identification depends on the resolution of molecular markers (or DNA barcodes) and the species coverage of the reference library. Considerable efforts have been made to find the ideal DNA barcodes for plants (CBOL Plant Working Group, 2009;Dong et al, 2014Dong et al, , 2015Kress & Erickson, 2007;Li et al, 2011) as well as to develop new technical improvements (Giovino et al, 2020a;Hollingsworth et al, 2011;Xu et al, 2015;Yu et al, 2011). Unlike animals which COI (mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I) is a nearly sole DNA barcode, plant DNA barcoding is much more complicated and no ideal DNA barcodes for plants have yet been discovered, or perhaps they do not exist at all (Giovino et al, 2020b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%