An Integrated Assessment of the Competitiveness of a Sustainable City within the Context of the COVID-19 Impact

Abstract

It is crucial for a city to ensure economic stability and growth, along with social security and prosperity, not only for the present, but also for future generations. Increasingly, researchers are highlighting the need to apply sustainable urban growth principles to the field of urban development, arguing that this would reduce the negative impacts of urbanization processes (poverty, air pollution, unemployment, and crime). At the same time, cities are competing with one another to maintain their position in the urban hierarchy, not only in the short term, but also in the long term. The COVID-19 pandemic affected many areas of our everyday life: over 5.85 million deaths, increased unemployment, the introduction of restrictions, the closure of national borders, and various other circumstances have all undoubtedly affected to a certain degree those factors which serve to influence competitiveness. The aim of this article is to conduct an integrated competitiveness assessment of the Baltic capitals within the context of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic for the period 2015–2020, according to an integrated assessment model for urban competitiveness (MDK), which is based upon the principles of sustainable development. A systematic and comparative analysis of the concepts published in the scientific literature has been performed, the concepts of sustainable city and sustainable urban competitiveness have been formed, research and methods of urban competitiveness evaluation have been carried out, and a comprehensive competitiveness assessment of the results of the study showed that the evaluation of integrated competitiveness of a sustainable city in the context of the impact of COVID-19 (using the Baltic capitals as an example in the period 2015–2020), in terms of the multi-criteria SAW and TOPSIS evaluation methods, is in the highest position in 2016–2019. Vilnius is in second place during the whole period 2016–2019. Riga takes third place in 2015–2019 (except in 2020, when it exchanges places with Vilnius and takes second place). Meanwhile, the results of the COPRAS multicriteria method differ from those discussed above. In 2016, 2019, and 2020, Tallinn is in the highest position, and in 2015, 2017, and 2018, it is surpassed by Vilnius. Riga remained in third place from 2015 to 2019. In 2020, Vilnius took over this position.

Evaluating Urban Sustainability in Uzbekistan: A Novel Formula for Empirical Analysis

“…Urban sustainability in Uzbekistan is highly dependent on economic growth as the nation transitions from a resource-based to a more diversified and knowledge-based economy. Infrastructure, education, and innovation spending are crucial for fostering long-term economic growth and raising living standards in urban areas [41,42]. Yet, attaining balanced and fair development is still challenging due to persistent income and resource availability differences between various regions and socioeconomic groups [6].…”

National Quality and Sustainable Development: An Empirical Analysis Based on China’s Provincial Panel Data

“…The last decade has witnessed dramatic growth in the abovementioned provinces' sustainable economic growth. Nevertheless, The ISEW of all provinces dropped in 2020, which may have been caused by recessions during the COVID-19 pandemic period; this included an increasing unemployment rate, declining labor force quality, a lower rate of international exchange, and a significant reduction in the sustainable development of the regional economy [35].…”

Small Towns’ Functions as a Determinant of the Standard of Living in Rural Areas—An Example from Poland

“…A synthetic living standard indicator was calculated using TOPSIS [47], a method commonly used in economic research [48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55]. The method weighs decision alternatives by measuring their distance from two reference points-the PIS (positive ideal solution) and the NIS (negative ideal solution).…”