2016
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2016.2596290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Integrated Framework for the Spatio–Temporal–Spectral Fusion of Remote Sensing Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
129
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 286 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
129
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The integration of spatial, spectral and temporal resolution [6] using hidden markov model, PSM/MS model and filtering methods are used to obtain high spatial-temporal -spectral resolution fused data. The main advantage is low noise distortion in the obtained fused image but its efficiency is low.…”
Section: Temporal Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integration of spatial, spectral and temporal resolution [6] using hidden markov model, PSM/MS model and filtering methods are used to obtain high spatial-temporal -spectral resolution fused data. The main advantage is low noise distortion in the obtained fused image but its efficiency is low.…”
Section: Temporal Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional pan-sharpening algorithms can be divided into three major branches: Component Substitution (CS) [1][2], Detail Injection (DI) [3] [4], and regularization constraint model based methods [5] [6]. In the former two branches, the fusing process is usually split into discrete steps, instead of end-to-end mapping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four metrics: Q, ERGAS, SAM, and SCC are employed to quantify its accuracy in spatial and spectral domains, with the original MS image as ground truth. The performances of DRPNN are compared with five algorithms from different branches for comparisons with the proposed network, including Component Substitution: GS [1], Detail Injection: MTF-GLP [3], SFIM [4], regularization constraint models: ISTS [5] based on total variation and TSSC [6] based on sparse representation. Besides these traditional algorithms, PNN [10], a shallow CNN without recidual learning and skip connection has also been included for comparison.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model-based methods regard the fusion process as an ill-posed inverse optimization problem, and construct the energy functional based on the HR-PAN image, the LR-M S images and the ideal fused image. Then iterative optimization algorithm, such as the gradient des cent algorithm [6], the conjugate gradient algorithm [7], the split Bregman iteration algorithm [8], and the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) algorithm [9], is used to solve the model to get the fused image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%