2019
DOI: 10.3390/math7100982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Integrated Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Evaluating Business Process Information Systems

Abstract: The prevalence of business-to-business (B2B) has made the relationship among firms more closer than ever. Whether in simple arm-length transactions or business cooperation, many firms, in order to reduce costs and achieve efficiency, have shifted their day-to-day operations from the tradition of relying on manpower to the use of information technology in handling tasks such as inventory, procurement, production planning, distribution, etc. As a result, the need of a business process information system is immin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mohammed et al (2019) proposed an integrated fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS method to rank suppliers depending on three sets of criteria. Kang et al (2019) adopted the fuzzy DEMATEL to understand the interrelationships among criteria, applied the fuzzy ANP to calculate the importance of factors and used the fuzzy TOPSIS to rank the business process information systems. Gupta et al (2019) proposed an MCDM framework based on the fuzzy AHP, MABAC, WASPAS and TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers.…”
Section: Hybrid Methods Of Fuzzy Mcdm or And Aimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mohammed et al (2019) proposed an integrated fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS method to rank suppliers depending on three sets of criteria. Kang et al (2019) adopted the fuzzy DEMATEL to understand the interrelationships among criteria, applied the fuzzy ANP to calculate the importance of factors and used the fuzzy TOPSIS to rank the business process information systems. Gupta et al (2019) proposed an MCDM framework based on the fuzzy AHP, MABAC, WASPAS and TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers.…”
Section: Hybrid Methods Of Fuzzy Mcdm or And Aimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Narayanan et al (2019) identified, modeled, analyzed and prioritized the barriers in conducting sustainable SC practices. Kang et al (2019) proposed a hybrid MCDM approach to evaluate business process information systems. Poornikoo and Customer management 2%…”
Section: Applications Of Fuzzy Techniques In Scmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets are governed by the condition that the summation of q th power of the membership function and the q th power of the non-membership grade that are limited in the interval [0, 1]. These and other extensions of the fuzzy sets were proposed by researchers for the implementation into the various MCDM problems [4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This proposal is based on a multi-criteria decision analysis, which deals with the process of taking decisions among a decision maker who evaluate different alternatives on several criteria [15]. Classically, most of MCDM approaches have been formulated for choice and ranking problems in which it is obtained the best alternative for the decision problem or a ranking of them [16][17][18][19][20]. Nevertheless, this contribution focuses on MCDM sorting problems, in which the alternatives are classified into several categories previously defined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%