An Integrated GIS-BBN Approach to Quantify Resilience of Roadways Network Infrastructure System against Flood Hazard

Sen, M. K.; Dutta, Subhrajit

doi:10.1061/ajrua6.0001088

Cited by 17 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 59 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, the method of analysis and the indicators selected for the analysis also varied based on pre-and post-disaster phases. In addition, the analysis showed that most of the frameworks were compensated with the probabilisticbased study [25,27,28,33]. The analysis of the year of publication of the study shows that more than 50% of the frameworks were published in 2020 and 25% in 2019 (Figure 4).…”

Section: Key Findings and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Key Findings and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There are stand-alone frameworks [31,32,77,78] to assess infrastructure resilience. However, some other frameworks are multi-dimensional frameworks [25][26][27]79] in which the infrastructure resilience assessment is one among key resilience dimensions such as social, economic, ecological, and institutional. A number of stand-alone infrastructure resilience frameworks used different methods for their development.…”

Section: Types Of Infrastructure Resilience Framework Evaluated In Th...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A number of stand-alone infrastructure resilience frameworks used different methods for their development. These included rapid visual screening [65], UN resilience scorecard [69], reconstruction conceptual framework [73], decision support framework [28,29,31], and probabilistic-based framework [25,26,28,35,36,79]. However, some frameworks have used multiple methods such as fragility functions and decision-making strategies [28,29].…”

Section: Types Of Infrastructure Resilience Framework Evaluated In Th...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The resilience of infrastructure systems and infrastructure interdependencies and the damage assessments are carried out with virtual city models for different seismic scenarios [23]. Some other frameworks have assessed the functionality of the critical infrastructure during and after disasters through performance-based design [24], a Bayesian network [25][26][27][28], fragility functions [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38], and restoration curves [29]. Furthermore, a qualitative assessment can be carried out to assess the functionality of the critical infrastructures [39,40].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Resilience of Critical Infrastructure Systems: A Systematic Literature Review of Measurement Frameworks

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Critical infrastructures such as transportation, power, telecommunication, water supply, and hospitals play a vital role in effectively managing post-disaster responses. The resilience of critical infrastructures should be incorporated in the planning and designing phase based on the risk assessment in a particular geographic area. However, the framework to assess critical infrastructure resilience (CIR) is variably conceptualised. Therefore, the objective of this study was to critically appraise the existing CIR assessment frameworks developed since the adoption of the Sendai Framework in 2015 with the hazard focus on earthquakes. The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) method was used for the selection of the 24 most relevant studies, and these were analysed to delineate existing frameworks, models, and concepts. The study found that there are wide-ranging disparities among the existing frameworks to assess the infrastructure resilience, and it has become a key challenge to prioritise resilience-based investment in the infrastructure sector. Furthermore, key attributes such as performance indicators, emergency aspects, and damage assessment need to be considered for different disaster phases—ex-ante, during, and ex-post—to improve the long-term resilience of critical infrastructure. Subsequently, an integrated and adaptable infrastructure resilience assessment framework is proposed for proper critical infrastructure planning and resilience-based investment decision making.

show abstract

Section: Key Findings and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Key Findings and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Types Of Infrastructure Resilience Framework Evaluated In Th...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Types Of Infrastructure Resilience Framework Evaluated In Th...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Resilience of Critical Infrastructure Systems: A Systematic Literature Review of Measurement Frameworks

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Flood Resilience Quantification for Housing Infrastructure Using Analytic Hierarchy Process

Sen

Dutta

Kabir

2021

Resilient Infrastructure

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Flood risk assessment of suburban region in India by incorporating flood hazard, vulnerability and exposure

Bhere,

Reddy

2024

Nat Hazards

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An Integrated GIS-BBN Approach to Quantify Resilience of Roadways Network Infrastructure System against Flood Hazard

Cited by 17 publications

References 59 publications

Resilience of Critical Infrastructure Systems: A Systematic Literature Review of Measurement Frameworks

Resilience of Critical Infrastructure Systems: A Systematic Literature Review of Measurement Frameworks

Flood Resilience Quantification for Housing Infrastructure Using Analytic Hierarchy Process

Flood risk assessment of suburban region in India by incorporating flood hazard, vulnerability and exposure

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About