An integrated health sector response to violence against women in Malaysia: lessons for supporting scale up

Abstract

BackgroundMalaysia has been at the forefront of the development and scale up of One-Stop Crisis Centres (OSCC) - an integrated health sector model that provides comprehensive care to women and children experiencing physical, emotional and sexual abuse. This study explored the strengths and challenges faced during the scaling up of the OSCC model to two States in Malaysia in order to identify lessons for supporting successful scale-up.MethodsIn-depth interviews were conducted with health care providers, policy makers and key informants in 7 hospital facilities. This was complemented by a document analysis of hospital records and protocols. Data were coded and analysed using NVivo 7.ResultsThe implementation of the OSCC model differed between hospital settings, with practise being influenced by organisational systems and constraints. Health providers generally tried to offer care to abused women, but they are not fully supported within their facility due to lack of training, time constraints, limited allocated budget, or lack of referral system to external support services. Non-specialised hospitals in both States struggled with a scarcity of specialised staff and limited referral options for abused women. Despite these challenges, even in more resource-constrained settings staff who took the initiative found it was possible to adapt to provide some level of OSCC services, such as referring women to local NGOs or community support groups, or training nurses to offer basic counselling.ConclusionsThe national implementation of OSCC provides a potentially important source of support for women experiencing violence. Our findings confirm that pilot interventions for health sector responses to gender based violence can be scaled up only when there is a sound health infrastructure in place – in other words a supportive health system. Furthermore, the successful replication of the OSCC model in other similar settings requires that the model – and the system supporting it – needs to be flexible enough to allow adaptation of the service model to different types of facilities and levels of care, and to available resources and thus better support providers committed to delivering care to abused women.

Implementing intimate partner violence care in a rural sub-district of South Africa: a qualitative evaluation

“…Despite this, there is limited literature describing scaled-up programmes or integrated health system responses (10). …”

A move beyond screening is required to ensure adequate healthcare response for women who experience intimate partner violence

“…Despite this debate and recommendations for universal screening, O'Doherty and colleagues could only identify 11 trials of necessary quality for inclusion, with only three trials assessing referrals. This is concerning, as it has been established that women and healthcare providers only endorse screening if disclosure is followed by an adequate response, at a minimum, by referrals to onsite or external services 4 5. Another concern is the quality of screening that is currently taking place; the review found fairly low identification rates of screening compared to prevalence rates estimations in the population.…”

Intimate partner violence: How should health systems respond?

“…[13] IPV interventions are complex, and require colla boration between many sectors such as health, social services and criminal justice, as well as systems that facilitate these. They therefore require more than provider training to enable effective programme functioning within a health system.…”

“…Factors relating to health system structure and organisation, as well as external policy constraints, were found to be barriers to implementation. [13] Several system-level factors arising from this case study could be applicable in other contexts. Commitment at policy level was found to be necessary, which could be communicated to service delivery level by incorporating appropriate indicators into routine reporting.…”