2016
DOI: 10.22260/isarc2016/0124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Integrated INS-GPS-Raspberry Pi System Using the Time-Sphere Model for Real-Time Identification of Struck-by-Equipment Hazard

Abstract: Struck-by-equipment hazard, i.e, contact collision between worker-on-foot and construction equipment or between equipment and equipment, is a major cause of injuries and fatalities in construction. A variety of smart technologies and systems have been developed and utilized to alleviate the risks of this type of hazard. However, most of the existing technologies and systems perform with a high rate of false alarms which have critically impeded their implementations on real construction sites. Therefore, a syst… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The studies conveying information beyond a binary presence or absence of hazard are recognized with a star mark -, , and , for auditory, visual, and tactile communication, respectively. [111] 2005 [129] 2007 [117] 2010 [112] 2011 [131] 2011 [136] 2012 [137] 2012 [113] 2014 [135] 2014 [128] 2015 [126] 2015 [130] 2015 [125] 2016 [138] 2016 [134] 2016 [139] 2016 [116] 2017 [120] 2018 (19), followed by tactile feedback (15), and visual alerts (12). Hard hat, with eleven instances, was the most frequent on-body placement.…”
Section: Results and Discussion On Wearable Safety Promotion Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The studies conveying information beyond a binary presence or absence of hazard are recognized with a star mark -, , and , for auditory, visual, and tactile communication, respectively. [111] 2005 [129] 2007 [117] 2010 [112] 2011 [131] 2011 [136] 2012 [137] 2012 [113] 2014 [135] 2014 [128] 2015 [126] 2015 [130] 2015 [125] 2016 [138] 2016 [134] 2016 [139] 2016 [116] 2017 [120] 2018 (19), followed by tactile feedback (15), and visual alerts (12). Hard hat, with eleven instances, was the most frequent on-body placement.…”
Section: Results and Discussion On Wearable Safety Promotion Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary on in Table 3. The research studies that convey absence of danger are also recognized with a to communicate about the proximity to the h the approaching equipment among other in made to convey rich wearable safety alerts a [111] 2005 [129] 2007 [117] 2010 [112] 2011 [131] 2011 [136] 2012 [137] 2012 [113] 2014 [135] 2014 [128] 2015 [126] 2015 [130] 2015 [125] 2016 [138] 2016 [134] 2016 [139] 2016 [116] 2017 [120] 2018 [124] 2018 [115] 2018 [121] 2019 [123] 2019 [127] 2020 [133] 2020 [118] 2020 [119] 2020 [132] 2020 [120] 2018…”
Section: Results and Discussion On Wearable Samentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations