2018
DOI: 10.1108/jmtm-03-2017-0032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An integrated interpretive structural modeling and a graph-theoretic approach for measuring the supply chain complexity in the Indian automotive industry

Abstract: Purpose Easily employable quantitative supply chain complexity (SCC) measures considering the significant dimensions of complexity as well as the drivers that represent those dimensions are limited in the literature. The purpose of this paper is to propose an integrated interpretive structural modeling (ISM) and a graph-theoretic approach to quantify SCC by a single numerical index considering the interdependence and the inheritance of the SCC drivers. Design/methodology/approach In total, 18 SCC drivers ide… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…All responses from experts are then correlated through consensus of the individual's judgments (Horenbeek and Pintelon 2014). The consensus method of correlation is the most effective in this type of analysis (Dwivedi et al 2017;Kavilal et al 2018). Factors description sheet is provided to all the experts to avoid biases.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All responses from experts are then correlated through consensus of the individual's judgments (Horenbeek and Pintelon 2014). The consensus method of correlation is the most effective in this type of analysis (Dwivedi et al 2017;Kavilal et al 2018). Factors description sheet is provided to all the experts to avoid biases.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ISM technique was executed based on the literature (Bhosale and Kant, 2016; Gorane and Kant, 2013; Katiyar et al , 2018; Kavilal et al , 2018; Kumar and Dixit, 2018; Lamba and Singh, 2018; Luthra et al , 2011; Mishra et al , 2017; Shanker and Barve, 2021; Sindhu et al , 2016; Yadav and Singh, 2020) as follows: Step 1 : Identifying the drivers of supply chain responsiveness; Step 2 : Establish the interrelationship between the identified drivers from expert opinion; Step 3 : Construct the structured self-interaction matrix (SSIM) to establish contextual relationships among the drivers. The opinion of the experts was used for the construction of the SSIM.…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ISM technique was executed based on the literature (Bhosale and Kant, 2016;Gorane and Kant, 2013;Katiyar et al, 2018;Kavilal et al, 2018;Kumar and Dixit, 2018; Integrated fuzzy DEMATEL-ISM approach Lamba and Singh, 2018;Luthra et al, 2011;Mishra et al, 2017;Shanker and Barve, 2021;Sindhu et al, 2016;Yadav and Singh, 2020) as follows:…”
Section: Interpretive Structural Modelling Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is pointed out by Simons (1962), a complex socio-technique system is "made up of a large number of parts that interact in a non-simple way". With no exception, supply chain is also a complex system composed of a series of components (Kavilal et al, 2018). Therefore, complexity is an important concept that cannot be avoided when studying supply chain systems.…”
Section: Supply Chain Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%