2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An integrated linguistic-based group decision-making approach for quality function deployment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As explained before, DMs participating in the QFD analysis processes frequently provide opinions based on missing or imprecise preferences [5,18,21,22,32]. In these cases, GDM becomes an important tool in QFD to unify DMs subjective judgments [14].…”
Section: Incomplete Preference Relations and Gdm In Qfdmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As explained before, DMs participating in the QFD analysis processes frequently provide opinions based on missing or imprecise preferences [5,18,21,22,32]. In these cases, GDM becomes an important tool in QFD to unify DMs subjective judgments [14].…”
Section: Incomplete Preference Relations and Gdm In Qfdmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The proposed approach is illustrated with real-world applications in new product development. Wang and Xiong [21] proposed an integrated linguistic GDM approach in QFD with an illustrative example. More recently, Li and his colleagues [31] tackled with the problem of evaluating the relative satisfaction levels of CRs by combining multiformat preference information in an integrated GDM approach and three types of least-square models for acquiring the sale points of CRs.…”
Section: Multi-preference Relations and Gdm In Qfdmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is also crucial to assign definite numbers to stakeholder's requirements as requirement elicitation may involve distinct stakeholders having different preferences for the same requirements. The rationale behind it is that distinct stakeholders have different levels of knowledge, training and skills [8]. Moreover in reality, linguistic terms such as low cost, high profit are generally used by the stakeholders to communicate their requirement preferences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%