2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.08.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Integrated Lumped Parameter-CFD approach for off-design ejector performance evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To obtain more accurate prediction performance, the ejector component efficiencies should be determined carefully since they dramatically influence the validity of an ejector model [26] and the values of the efficiencies depend on the ejector geometry, working fluid and operation conditions [8,9]. In this paper, five efficiencies, η p , η s , η m , φ m and η d are introduced in critical point model.…”
Section: Experimental Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To obtain more accurate prediction performance, the ejector component efficiencies should be determined carefully since they dramatically influence the validity of an ejector model [26] and the values of the efficiencies depend on the ejector geometry, working fluid and operation conditions [8,9]. In this paper, five efficiencies, η p , η s , η m , φ m and η d are introduced in critical point model.…”
Section: Experimental Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with their experiment data of R141b ejectors, the maximum evaluation error is 22.99%. Besagni et al [9] proposed a model for sonic and sub-sonic ejectors based on the ideal-gas assumption. In the model, the correlation equations of ejector component efficiencies were determined by CFD method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the spatial discretization was developed considering the "Green-Gauss Cell Based" approach for the gradient and the "Third-Order MUSCL" for the flow and the turbulent kinetic The calculation mesh was obtained with the devoted tool of Fluent considering the following aspects: about 530,000 cells, tetrahedral type, unstructured approach, curvature and proximity (5 cells minimum number) method, 10 inflation levels on the solid boundaries (preliminary calculations showed no significant solution variation increasing the inflation levels, in agreement with the wall treatment performance shown in [27] for the fine mesh). A preliminary mesh was obtained with the Fluent mesher tool.…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The obtained mesh quality was about 0.5. This mesh was selected after some preliminary calculations to obtain a good solution independence from the grid [27,28]. Theses preliminary simulations showed about 13% change in the recirculation ratio (in comparison with the chosen approach) for a mesh composed of 252,000 cells and no significant variations for values higher than 500,000 cells.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discussion about turbulence models has been continued. Zhu et al rendered that the RNG k-epsilon turbulence viscosity model agreed best with the shock wave structures [27], while Besagni compared seven models and showed that the k-ω SST presented a better performance [30]. Considering the calculating time and convergence rate, the standard model was applied to simulate the high speed flow in this work.…”
Section: Cfd Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%