2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An integrated management approach of the project and project risks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of this data, it is possible to predict whether the project will be implemented by the planned deadline and the budget kept, or whether the project inclines towards deviations from the plan. (Project Management Institute, 2005;Acebes et al, 2012;Storms, 2008) For the entire project life cycle, it is necessary to monitor any potential risks (Rodney et al, 2015). Formalized Risk Analysis makes it possible to identify the risks, to assess the probability and potential impacts of the risks, and to take effective measures leading to their elimination over the entire course of project implementation (Benta et al, 2011).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of this data, it is possible to predict whether the project will be implemented by the planned deadline and the budget kept, or whether the project inclines towards deviations from the plan. (Project Management Institute, 2005;Acebes et al, 2012;Storms, 2008) For the entire project life cycle, it is necessary to monitor any potential risks (Rodney et al, 2015). Formalized Risk Analysis makes it possible to identify the risks, to assess the probability and potential impacts of the risks, and to take effective measures leading to their elimination over the entire course of project implementation (Benta et al, 2011).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studi-studi penanganan pemeliharaan jembatan selama ini lebih fokus pada kondisi fisiknya (Valenca et al, 2017;Garavaglia & Sgambi, 2016;Huang & Huang, 2012). Beberapa studi manajemen masih berupa tataran perencanaan (Yin et al, 2011;Sabatino et al, 2015;Yong et al, 2014) dan analisis risiko pekerjaan (Rodney et al, 2015;Carvalho et al, 2015) Untuk mendukung BMS tersebut, penelitian ini mengusulkan untuk menggunakan metode AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) dalam membantu proses penentuan program penanganan jembatan secara komprehensif khususnya dalam penentuan urutan prioritas penanganan pemeliharaan jembatan. Keterkaitan antara Metode BMS dan Metode AHP adalah penentuan kondisi jembatan umumnya menggunakan metode BMS dan data-data kondisi jembatan tersebut dapat mendukung di dalam kriteria dan sub kriteria yang akan digunakan didalam metode AHP.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Kota Pangkalpinang, dan prioritas ketiga adalah Nangka di Ruas Puding Besar-Bts.Kota Pangkalpinang. Melihat faktor-faktor yang dikembangkan untuk menentukan prioritas, maka penelitian ini lebih komperhensif daripada yang dilakukan Rodney et al (2015) dan Carvalho et al (2015) yang hanya mengutamakan faktor risiko dalam manajemen jembatan.…”
Section: Proses Skoring Alternatif Berdasarkan Variabelunclassified
“…What can be done is an attempt to describe and to understand emergent behaviour, whether or not we can influence the results [9]. Both an approach to an external vision that reflects the interaction of the system with the environment and an internal vision that reflects the interaction between system components, is required [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%