2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2015.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An integrated method for the emotional conceptualization and sensory characterization of food products: The EmoSensory ® Wheel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
38
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These results also support the growing body of literature stating that emotional conceptualizations are mainly sensory driven (Gibson, ; Gutjar et al, ; King & Meiselman, ; Ng et al, ; Schouteten et al, ; Schouteten et al, ; Spinelli et al, ; Thomson, Crocker, & Marketo, ). For instance, while a large part of the children and teenagers associated positive emotions with the local producer logo (logo condition), the number of participants checking the same positive emotions is substantially lower during the informed condition, but similar to the number of participants in the blind condition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…These results also support the growing body of literature stating that emotional conceptualizations are mainly sensory driven (Gibson, ; Gutjar et al, ; King & Meiselman, ; Ng et al, ; Schouteten et al, ; Schouteten et al, ; Spinelli et al, ; Thomson, Crocker, & Marketo, ). For instance, while a large part of the children and teenagers associated positive emotions with the local producer logo (logo condition), the number of participants checking the same positive emotions is substantially lower during the informed condition, but similar to the number of participants in the blind condition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The sensory evaluation first elicited overall sensory liking, based on 9‐point Likert scale (from 1—extremely dislike, to 9—extremely like). Second, respondents were asked evaluate the sensory attributes and emotional conceptualizations for each product using the rate‐all‐that‐apply method (Ares et al, ), presented through the EmoSensory® wheel (Schouteten et al, ). The EmoSensory® Wheel is a recently introduced and validated technique which enables the assessment of both sensory and emotional profiling by consumers using an integrated wheel questionnaire format (Schouteten et al, 2015b; 2017) (see Figure for the three applications in the present study).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emotional and sensory terms were selected for each product, using a two‐step procedure with a small group of consumers (20 persons) (Ng et al, ; Schouteten et al, ). First, during three different sessions participants evaluated the applicability of a master list of terms, which was generated on literature and prior research on the products under study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…classified as ‘credence attributes’ (because they cannot be verified even after consumption of the food product) into ‘search attributes’ (whose presence can be verified by consumers before purchase) . Information about healthiness could be used by consumers as a quality signal influencing their expected acceptance of food products and increasing their motivation to try them. The result of the interaction between information and consumers' attitudes and beliefs can influence the perceived healthiness, leading to differential changes in sensory ratings of labelled stimuli products …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%