1996
DOI: 10.1080/00207549608905023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An integrated methodology for automating the determination of layout and materials handling system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The methodologies suggested by Das (1993), Welgama and Gibson (1996), Dweiri and Meier (1996), Kim and Kim (2000) and Deb and Bhattacharyya (2003a) are based on facility selection order and placement routine. The selection order depends on the flow matrix and it is considered the same for the above procedures.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The methodologies suggested by Das (1993), Welgama and Gibson (1996), Dweiri and Meier (1996), Kim and Kim (2000) and Deb and Bhattacharyya (2003a) are based on facility selection order and placement routine. The selection order depends on the flow matrix and it is considered the same for the above procedures.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The facility layout problem under a manufacturing environment arranges the machines on an open floor space in order to minimize the total material flow cost. Some general facility layout design methods consider the machine block orientation as fixed to either the horizontal or vertical (Welgama and Gibson 1996). The open field type layout, where there is no predetermined layout pattern, is difficult to solve and is the primary focus of this research paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other integrated approache s have been proposed. Welgama and Gibson (1996) proposed a new methodology using a knowledge-based/optimization approach for the determination of layout and the materials-handling system when neither of these is ®xed. The knowledge base determines the feasibility of a materials-handling equipment type for a given move while the optimization determines how the machines should be laid out to minimize the materials-handlin g costs and the dead space.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MHE selection problem is made much more difficult by the lack of a systematic approach to equipment selection. Thus, several expert systems have been built for the MHE selection problem (Chu et al, 1995;Fisher et al, 1988;Kim and Eom, 1997;Maison et al, 1992;Park, 1996;Welgama and Gibson, 1996). It is apparent that knowledge associated with material handling is not obtained from one single source or one human expert.…”
Section: Compilation Of the Knowledge Basementioning
confidence: 99%