2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An integrated model of active glenohumeral stability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
56
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
4
56
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This was related to the fact that loaded edges represent stress concentration points and lead to singularities in the finite element mesh where the elastic strains and stresses are theoretically infinite. However, the evolution and the final volume of the process zone was independent from the finite element mesh as soon as the be less than half (van der Helm 1994) or more than twice as high (Favre et al 2012) as the results reported in this study. In either case, using optimization-based muscle force estimation risks underestimating the supraspinatus force since optimization-based methods tend to underestimate stabilizing muscle activity (Engelhardt et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…This was related to the fact that loaded edges represent stress concentration points and lead to singularities in the finite element mesh where the elastic strains and stresses are theoretically infinite. However, the evolution and the final volume of the process zone was independent from the finite element mesh as soon as the be less than half (van der Helm 1994) or more than twice as high (Favre et al 2012) as the results reported in this study. In either case, using optimization-based muscle force estimation risks underestimating the supraspinatus force since optimization-based methods tend to underestimate stabilizing muscle activity (Engelhardt et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Conversely, our results showed different force patterns for the rotator cuff and deltoid muscles compared with the study of Yanagawa et al (2008): infraspinatus and supraspinatus showed almost constant forces during the movement while our stress-based model predicted a maximum at 708 of abduction. Another study calculated muscle forces for glenohumeral abduction up to 808 glenohumeral elevation (Favre et al 2012). Rotator cuff activity was higher compared with our stress-based method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In this position, the torque produced by the arm weight is maximal. The only other musculoskeletal model that considered humeral head translation (Favre et al 2012) uncoupled humeral head translation from muscle force estimation. Although this model did not continuously update the muscle moment arms associated to humeral head translation, it predicted an upward migration of the humeral head followed by a descent in the second half of the abduction movement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…whether their stability ratios were affected by the amount of humeral elevation and plane of elevation, a multi-factorial repeated-measures ANOVA was carried out using the stability ratios as dependent variable for the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, subscapularis, middle deltoid, pectoralis major and latissimus dorsi muscles. Within-subjects factors were the humeral elevation, with 6 levels between • spaced at 15 and from literature data [38], [41], [21], [22] as a function of humeral elevation during abduction.…”
Section: G Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally electromyographic studies have examined phasic activity of the shoulder muscles [11], [12] but cannot shed light on the changes in stability ratio during a movement. Musculoskeletal models, on the other hand, allow investigating movements in vivo while taking muscle activity into account [19], [20], [21]. In this way it has been shown that supraspinatus, infraspinatus and subscapularis contributed little to the glenohumeral abduction torque and presented low stability ratios during humeral abduction in the scapular plane [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%