An Integrated Routing and Medium Access Control Framework for Surveillance Networks of Mobile Devices

Martin, Nicholas; Al-Mousa, Yamin; Shenoy, Nirmala

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-17679-1_28

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…MMT (Multi Meshed Tree Protocol) [197] is a clusterbased routing protocol destined for FANET. MMT creates several clusters that are determinable based on their size and their maximum hop count from their respective CHs.…”

Section: Hierarchical-based Routing Protocolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Routing in Flying Ad Hoc Networks: Survey, Constraints, and Future Challenge Perspectives

Oubbati¹,

Atiquzzaman²,

Lorenz³

et al. 2019

IEEE Access

217

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Owing to the explosive expansion of wireless communication and networking technologies, cost-effective unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have recently emerged and soon they will occupy the major part of our sky. UAVs can be exploited to efficiently accomplish complex missions when cooperatively organized as an ad hoc network, thus creating the well-known flying ad hoc networks (FANETs). The establishment of such networks is not feasible without deploying an efficient networking model allowing a reliable exchange of information between UAVs. FANET inherits common features and characteristics from mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs) and their sub-classes, such as vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) and wireless sensor networks (WSNs). Unfortunately, UAVs are often deployed in the sky adopting a mobility model dictated by the nature of missions that they are expected to handle, and therefore, differentiate themselves from any traditional networks. Moreover, several flying constraints and the highly dynamic topology of FANETs make the design of routing protocols a complicated task. In this paper, a comprehensive survey is presented covering the architecture, the constraints, the mobility models, the routing techniques, and the simulation tools dedicated to FANETs. A classification, descriptions, and comparative studies of an important number of existing routing protocols dedicated to FANETs are detailed. Furthermore, the paper depicts future challenge perspectives, helping scientific researchers to discover some themes that have been addressed only ostensibly in the literature and need more investigation. The novelty of this survey is its uniqueness to provide a complete analysis of the major FANET routing protocols and to critically compare them according to different constraints based on crucial parameters, thus better presenting the state of the art of this specific area of research.INDEX TERMS UAV, FANET, mobility, simulation, routing protocols. TABLE 2. FANET communication comparison. C. FANET CHARACTERISTICSEach mission or application comes with different requirements in terms of the number of UAVs, the flight time, and the communication constraints. This diversifies the characteristics of FANETs and makes them unique, which differentiate them from other kinds of ad hoc networks. In this section, we provide a detailed description of the most crucial FANET characteristics that are considered during the deployment of such networks. 1) NODE SPEEDThe LAUs are considered as the most studied categories of UAVs. In this category, we distinguish two kinds of UAVs: (i) Rotary-Wing (RW) UAVs and (ii) Fixed-Wing (FW) UAVs [61]. In a general case, the mobility of both types of

show abstract

Section: Hierarchical-based Routing Protocolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Routing in Flying Ad Hoc Networks: Survey, Constraints, and Future Challenge Perspectives

Oubbati¹,

Atiquzzaman²,

Lorenz³

et al. 2019

IEEE Access

217

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…On the other hand, MPCA tries to predict the changes in the network topology and, depending on the mobility parameters of each UAV, calculates the clusters. Furthermore, it is possible to find other protocols that belong to this category, such as Landmark Ad Hoc Routing (LANMAR) [242], Multi-Meshed Tree Protocol (MMT) [243], Cluster-Based, Location-Aided DSR (CBLADSR) [244], and Disruption Tolerant Mechanism (DTM) [245].…”

Section: Clustering/hierarchical Routing Protocolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Reactive-Based RGR [223], GGF [224], ARPAM [225], MUDOR [226] Greedy-Based GPMOR [228], MPGR [229], GLSR [230], GPSR [231], GHG [232], GRG [233], GDSTR-3D [234], USMP [231] Heterogeneous CRUV [235], UVAR [236], PASER [237], XLinGo [238], SUAP [239] Clustering/ Hierarchical CAUN [240], MPCA [241], LANMAR [242], MMT [243], CBLADSR [244], DTM [245] Swarm-Based BeeAdHoc [246], AntHocNet [247], APAR [248] Delay-Tolerant Network LAROD [257], AeroRP [249], GRAA [250], Epidemic [251], Maxprop [252], Spray and Wait [253], Prophet [254]…”

Section: Topology-basedmentioning

confidence: 99%

Contribución al aumento de la capacidad cognitiva de los sistemas inteligentes de transporte mediante inteligencia artificial

Pérez¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Routing protocols strategies for flying Ad-Hoc network (FANET): Review, taxonomy, and open research issues

Almansor,

Din,

Baharuddin

et al. 2024

Alexandria Engineering Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An Integrated Routing and Medium Access Control Framework for Surveillance Networks of Mobile Devices

Cited by 5 publications

References 10 publications

Routing in Flying Ad Hoc Networks: Survey, Constraints, and Future Challenge Perspectives

Routing in Flying Ad Hoc Networks: Survey, Constraints, and Future Challenge Perspectives

Contribución al aumento de la capacidad cognitiva de los sistemas inteligentes de transporte mediante inteligencia artificial

Routing protocols strategies for flying Ad-Hoc network (FANET): Review, taxonomy, and open research issues

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About