2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2005.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An integration of fault detection and correction processes in software reliability analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to validate the fitting capability and prediction capability of the above two model, the data set [2] collected by Musa is used. We suppose the above data set is the data set of excluding repeated data set.…”
Section: The Instance and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to validate the fitting capability and prediction capability of the above two model, the data set [2] collected by Musa is used. We suppose the above data set is the data set of excluding repeated data set.…”
Section: The Instance and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…G-O S shape model, [2] presented model, Yamada Rayleigh model, Yamada exponential model. The results are in the table1.…”
Section: The Instance and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Singh et al (2007) incorporated the learning of the testing team in Lo and Huang (2006) model. Xie et al (2007) gave a unified scheme for developing SRGM considering debugging time lag.…”
Section: Haung and Lin Fdandd Time Lag Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the correction time may show a growing trend during the whole testing cycle, as later detected faults can be more difficult to correct. Some extensions were made in Lo and Huang [25] and Xie, et al [44] by incorporating other assumptions of debugging delay. Hu, et al [8] studied a data-driven artificial neural network model for the prediction of FDP and FCP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%