Advances and Applications in Geospatial Technology and Earth Resources 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-68240-2_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Integration of Least Squares Support Vector Machines and Firefly Optimization Algorithm for Flood Susceptible Modeling Using GIS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Evolution-based, including the genetic algorithm (GA) (Dodangeh et al, 2020;Hong et al, 2018), evolution strategies (Dodangeh et al, 2020), and differential evolution (DE) (Hong et al, 2018) • Physics-based, including simulated annealing (Harada et al, 2016) and wind-driven optimization (Liu et al, 2019) • Swarm-based, including ant colony optimization (Lai et al, 2016), the firefly algorithm (Nguyen et al, 2017;Nhu et al, 2020), grasshopper optimization algorithm (Ruidas et al, 2022), and particle swarm optimization (PSO) (Sachdeva et al, 2017) • Human-based, including culture algorithm (Tien Bui et al, 2018) and teaching learning-based optimization (Zamli, 2016) Previous studies have provided different solutions to solving real-life problems, which have fallen into three main categories: modifying current algorithms, hybridizing different algorithms, and proposing new algorithms. All three categories have been proven effective (Abualigah et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• Evolution-based, including the genetic algorithm (GA) (Dodangeh et al, 2020;Hong et al, 2018), evolution strategies (Dodangeh et al, 2020), and differential evolution (DE) (Hong et al, 2018) • Physics-based, including simulated annealing (Harada et al, 2016) and wind-driven optimization (Liu et al, 2019) • Swarm-based, including ant colony optimization (Lai et al, 2016), the firefly algorithm (Nguyen et al, 2017;Nhu et al, 2020), grasshopper optimization algorithm (Ruidas et al, 2022), and particle swarm optimization (PSO) (Sachdeva et al, 2017) • Human-based, including culture algorithm (Tien Bui et al, 2018) and teaching learning-based optimization (Zamli, 2016) Previous studies have provided different solutions to solving real-life problems, which have fallen into three main categories: modifying current algorithms, hybridizing different algorithms, and proposing new algorithms. All three categories have been proven effective (Abualigah et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several algorithms have been successfully applied to construct the flood susceptibility map. These have been divided into four main categories: Evolution‐based , including the genetic algorithm (GA) (Dodangeh et al, 2020; Hong et al, 2018), evolution strategies (Dodangeh et al, 2020), and differential evolution (DE) (Hong et al, 2018) Physics‐based , including simulated annealing (Harada et al, 2016) and wind‐driven optimization (Liu et al, 2019) Swarm‐based , including ant colony optimization (Lai et al, 2016), the firefly algorithm (Nguyen et al, 2017; Nhu et al, 2020), grasshopper optimization algorithm (Ruidas et al, 2022), and particle swarm optimization (PSO) (Sachdeva et al, 2017) Human‐based , including culture algorithm (Tien Bui et al, 2018) and teaching learning‐based optimization (Zamli, 2016) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the flood locations will be the dependent variable in estimating the flood susceptibility, a number of 12 flood predictors will be used as explanatory variables, and their spatial distribution will be based on the flood exposure values. It is worth stating that the following predictors were selected following a meticulous analysis of the literature (Nguyen et al 2017;Tang et al 2020;Costache et al 2020c): slope, altitude, aspect, TPI, TWI, convergence index, plan curvature, hydrological soil groups, land use, distance from rivers, lithology and rainfall. The first 7 mentioned flood predictors, which are also morphometric indices, were derived from the Digital Elevation Model (DEM) extract from the Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission (SRTM) 30 m. It is worth noting that, at the present moment, for perimeter covered the study area, another DEM with a high resolution of 30 m is not available.…”
Section: Flood Conditioning Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with its high support for flood and flash-flood early warning systems, the high-accurate estimation of flood exposed areas can also help to draw up the river basins flood defence plans (Albano et al 2017;Johann and Leismann 2017;Brillinger et al 2020). The following models are among the most popular ML algorithms used to estimate the flood susceptibility: Artificial Neural Network (ANN) (Costache et al 2020b), support vector machine (SVM) (Nguyen et al 2017;Tehrany et al 2019;Sahana et al 2020), decision trees-based models (Chen et al 2018;Khosravi et al 2018;Costache 2019c), naïve Bayes (Ali et al 2020;Tang et al 2020), deep learning neural network (Costache et al 2020a), extreme learning machine (Tang et al 2020). All the models applied in the above works achieved an accuracy higher than 80%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, using an optimization algorithm to boost the ability of ML models is a beneficial approach for drought forecasting. Firefly optimization algorithm (FA) as one of the nature-inspired algorithms has been successfully contributed to drought forecasting [41], flood studies [42,43], reference evapotranspiration estimation [44,45], rainfall pattern prediction [46], and groundwater studies [47,48]. Previous research has proven the performance of coupled ML techniques for drought modeling, however, the usage of hybrid models based on ANN coupled with the firefly algorithm (ANN-FA) has not yet been explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%