2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cirpj.2014.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An integrative approach to spatial mapping of pressure distribution in microrolling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in machining of titanium alloys and nickel-based alloys, it is concluded that further modeling studies are needed to create predictive physics-based models that are in good agreement with reliable experiments, while explaining the effects of many parameters [3]. However, the correlations between the process loads and surface integrity state variables or surface integrity parameters are hardly to be established quantitatively since a general relation independent from processes is not available to derive the dependence of surface integrity parameters on the various manufacturing processes, although many investigations have confirmed that different surface integrity states of manufactured components can be obtained by varying the process method and parameters [4][5][6]. The processindependent assessing of the various processes during manufacturing is more systematically concerned by Brinksmeier et al [7,8] with proposing a concept of process signature as a new approach to comprehensibly characterize the influence of machining processes on the material modifications generated in the component surface layer.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…For example, in machining of titanium alloys and nickel-based alloys, it is concluded that further modeling studies are needed to create predictive physics-based models that are in good agreement with reliable experiments, while explaining the effects of many parameters [3]. However, the correlations between the process loads and surface integrity state variables or surface integrity parameters are hardly to be established quantitatively since a general relation independent from processes is not available to derive the dependence of surface integrity parameters on the various manufacturing processes, although many investigations have confirmed that different surface integrity states of manufactured components can be obtained by varying the process method and parameters [4][5][6]. The processindependent assessing of the various processes during manufacturing is more systematically concerned by Brinksmeier et al [7,8] with proposing a concept of process signature as a new approach to comprehensibly characterize the influence of machining processes on the material modifications generated in the component surface layer.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…In the traditional size stamping process, the influence of various factors in the micro-stamping process is more obvious, such as friction factor, speed, depth and grain size. In the process of forming, there will be different deformation rules caused by the change of material size from the traditional macro-size, which called size effect [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%