An Integrative Evaluation Framework for Determining the Value of Group Decision Support Systems

Mora, Manuel; Phillips‐Wren, Gloria; Wang, Fen

doi:10.1080/10429247.2014.11432008

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 54 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Each decision maker has the privilege in his/her workstation, then anonymity, and strengthening their participation. [17]. There are diverse dimensions of GDSS associated with ecooperation.…”

Section: E-collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

E - Collaboration Knowledge Management

Manal¹

2019

IJATCSE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Knowledge plays a critical role in organizational resources that enables organizations to gain a competitive advantage. In the today world, the organizations need to investigate new solutions to remain ahead of the competition. Therefore, organizations endeavor to face the challenges by using technologies to enable an efficient management of the e-collaboration and knowledge management. Many models and techniques have been discussed over years for e-collaboration and knowledge management within organizations. Current changes in Information, and Communication Technology (ICT) have prompted organizations to utilize platforms such as corporate portals for collaborative knowledge sharing. This paper introduces an overview of Knowledge Management (KM) and e-collaboration for the enterprise to gain advantage. The paper is appended by a case study of an organization where it applies KM and e-collaboration to cover the business needs and to improve management of enterprise content with collaboration of knowledge. The organizational structures and processes, standards and values are still the main areas that limit the effectiveness of e-collaboration. This requires changing the organizational focus and culture that remains a challenge for many organizations.

show abstract

Section: E-collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

E - Collaboration Knowledge Management

Manal¹

2019

IJATCSE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] The work by Wilhite and Lord 7 presented an approach for developing technology based on an assessment of development success generated from opinions and assessments from discipline experts located worldwide. Similarly, Mora et al 8 proposed a Group Decision Support System (GDSS) enriched with the AHP for making decisions that require technical inputs from experts, to support engineering managers and their decision processes. Mustafa et al 9 directly applied the AHP to evaluate the service quality of seven airline companies operating mainly in the Southeast.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Analytic Hierarchy Process approach using multiple raters for the selection of complex technologies

Wood¹,

Mason

Bianchini³

2020

Journal of Defense Modeling & Simulation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Department of Defense utilizes complex technologies in numerous fields; each technology must comply with specific parameters and system capabilities. In this selection of a complex technology best meeting prescribed capabilities, the parameter set includes nine areas, which have sub-areas. To handle the complexity of the process, the team identified the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), a methodology providing a reliable solution. The AHP produced an importance coefficient for each area and sub-area, which were combined in the final phase of the ranking process. Users and technical support personnel agreed that the selected system met the requirements, field operational needs, and maintenance requisites. The AHP approach represents a viable tool to handle group decisions in support of technology management and related selection processes.

show abstract