2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10548-013-0323-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Integrative Model of Subcortical Auditory Plasticity

Abstract: In direct conflict with the concept of auditory brainstem nuclei as passive relay stations for behaviorally-relevant signals, recent studies have demonstrated plasticity of the auditory signal in the brainstem. In this paper we provide an overview of the forms of plasticity evidenced in subcortical auditory regions. We posit an integrative model of auditory plasticity, which argues for a continuous, online modulation of bottom-up signals via corticofugal pathways, based on an algorithm that anticipates and upd… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
3
42
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results demonstrate the feasibility of machine learning approaches to characterize the FFR, which is considered a promising biomarker of auditory function (Chandrasekaran & Kraus, 2010; Chandrasekaran et al, 2012; Chandrasekaran., Skoe, & Kraus, 2014). Importantly, our study shows that the machine learning derived metrics can reflect biologically-relevant influences on auditory processing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results demonstrate the feasibility of machine learning approaches to characterize the FFR, which is considered a promising biomarker of auditory function (Chandrasekaran & Kraus, 2010; Chandrasekaran et al, 2012; Chandrasekaran., Skoe, & Kraus, 2014). Importantly, our study shows that the machine learning derived metrics can reflect biologically-relevant influences on auditory processing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Following this line of research, recent studies have documented a more faithful subcortical encoding of lexical tones (e.g., Mandarin tones) in native speakers of tonal languages (e.g., Chinese), relative to native speakers of languages that are not tonal (e.g., English) (Krishnan et al, 2010; Krishnan, Gandour, Bidelman, & Swaminathan, 2009; Krishnan et al, 2005; Xie et al, 2017). These results are theoretically interesting because they demonstrate that subcortical structures are not just passive relay stations, but relate to individual differences in auditory processing (Chandrasekaran, Skoe, & Kraus, 2014). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is likely that similar changes in the strength of the corticofugal inputs to the IC with changes in pitch salience may account for the experience-dependent enhancement of the subcortical responses. It has been proposed that the corticofugal inputs to the IC provide continuous online modulation of processing of pitch-relevant information based on a predictive algorithm wherein robust representation of behaviorally relevant features suggest smaller predictive error (Chandrasekaran et al, 2014). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this idea received support from early seminal studies suggesting subcortical generators to the MMN (Kraus et al, 1994; Csépe, 1995), it has been largely unexplored until recently (Escera and Malmierca, 2014). Yet, recent human studies have suggested that subcortical auditory stations may undergoo substantial experience-dependent plasticity (Chandrasekaran and Kraus, 2010; Kraus and Skoe, 2010; Chandrasekaran et al, 2013; Skoe et al, 2013, 2014). For example, Kraus et al have found that the brainstem activity is enhanced when stimulus sequences contain predictable sounds compared to more random (i.e., unpredictable) sequences that is infrequent and unpredictable.…”
Section: Stimulus-specific Adaptation Appears Subcorticallymentioning
confidence: 99%