An Integrative Review of Interprofessional Collaboration in Health Care: Building the Case for University Support and Resources and Faculty Engagement

Abstract

Background: In 2010, the World Health Organization issued a clarion call for action on interprofessional education and collaboration. This call came forty years after the concept of interprofessional collaboration (IPC) was introduced. Aim: To conduct an integrative review of interprofessional collaboration in health care education in order to evaluate evidence and build the case for university support and resources and faculty engagement, and propose evidence-based implications and recommendations. Search Strategy: A literature search was conducted by an interprofessional faculty from a college of nursing and health sciences. Databases searched included CINAHL, Medline, Eric, Pubmed, Psych Info Lit., and Google Scholar. Keywords were interdisciplinary, interprofessional, multidisciplinary, transdisciplinary, health care team, teamwork, and collaboration. Inclusion criteria were articles that were in the English language, and published between 1995 and 2019. Review Methods: Thirteen interprofessional team members searched assigned databases. Based on key words and inclusion criteria, over 216,885 articles were identified. After removing duplicates, educational studies, available as full text were reviewed based on titles, and abstracts. Thirty-two articles were further evaluated utilizing the Sirriyeh, Lawton, Gardner, and Armitage (2012) review system. Faculty agreed that an inclusion score of 20 or more would determine an article’s inclusion for the final review. Eighteen articles met the inclusion score and the data was reduced and analyzed using the Donabedian Model to determine the structure, processes, and outcomes of IPC in health care education. Results: Structure included national and international institutions of higher education and focused primarily on undergraduate and graduate health care students’ experiences. The IPC processes included curricular, course, and clinical initiatives, and transactional and interpersonal processes. Outcomes were positive changes in faculty and health care students’ knowledge, attitudes, and skills regarding IPC, as well as challenges related to structure, processes, and outcomes which need to be addressed. Implications/Recommendations/Conclusions: The creation of a culture of interprofessional collaboration requires a simultaneous “top–down” and “bottom–up” approach with commitment by the university administration and faculty. A university Interprofessional Strategic Plan is important to guide the vision, mission, goals, and strategies to promote and reward IPC and encourage faculty champions. University support and resources are critical to advance curricular, course, and clinical initiatives. Grassroots efforts of faculty to collaborate with colleagues outside of their own disciplines are acknowledged, encouraged, and established as a normative expectation. Challenges to interprofessional collaboration are openly addressed and solutions proposed through the best thinking of the university administration and faculty. IPC in health care education is the clarion call globally to improve health care.

Whispers of Consciousness: the Interplay of Surgery, Internal Medicine, and Anesthesia

“…These findings echo the growing consensus within the medical community that holistic, team-based care approaches are paramount in addressing the multifaceted needs of patients in a comprehensive manner. (15,16)…”

Nurse-to-Nurse Collaboration

“…Collaboration between professionals is fundamental to ensure that best care is offered to patients within healthcare systems 1 and to help patients regain their primary health status after illness. [2][3][4] Interprofessional relationship is a process through which different groups of professionals, including physiotherapists, nurses, physicians, or occupational therapists, work together to obtain the health objectives in the most effective and efficient way. 5 Evidence-based science highlights how good collaboration between healthcare workers improves clinical practice and encourages discussion about problems within the healthcare system.…”

Metodologias ativas e o ensino remoto: integrando o Programa de Educação pelo Trabalho para Saúde – Interprofissionalidade e a residência multiprofissional

“…Foi constatado pelos alunos de graduação e residentes que seus currículos focalizam majoritariamente as competências técnicas (específicas), sem ampliação para as competências gerais que fomentam o campo de atuação interprofissional. Em uma revisão de literatura foram identificadas 11 competências essenciais, que são contempladas nas Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais (DCNs), das quais a comunicação, colaboração e liderança 9 Essas competências vão ao encontro de estudo 10 , o qual afirma que a EIP permite a resolução de problemas com base em equipe e representa a interação entre vários profissionais de saúde que compartilham os mesmos objetivos em saúde.…”