2014
DOI: 10.4102/curationis.v37i1.1193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An integrative review of South African cancer nursing research published from 2002–2012

Abstract: Background: This integrative review aimed to quantify the publication output of South African cancer nursing research conducted between 2002 and 2012 and to identify key trends relevant to cancer nurse researchers. Objectives:To describe the publication output of cancer nursing research in terms of the journals of publication, authors, focus, participants and methods used, to explore whether the published work was funded and to assess the quality of the studies published.Methods: An integrative review was cond… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…20 In addition, mixed-method studies were assessed using the criteria outlined by O'Cathain et al 21 and case studies using Stake's instrument outlined by Crowe et al 22 These instruments were also used in the South African review. 19 The researchers used the same instruments, as it allowed comparison of the work using the same criteria and possibly simplifying future comparisons.…”
Section: N Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…20 In addition, mixed-method studies were assessed using the criteria outlined by O'Cathain et al 21 and case studies using Stake's instrument outlined by Crowe et al 22 These instruments were also used in the South African review. 19 The researchers used the same instruments, as it allowed comparison of the work using the same criteria and possibly simplifying future comparisons.…”
Section: N Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Quantitative research was assessed using the 3-point grading scale developed by Mann, 2 and qualitative work used the rating system developed by Cesario and colleagues. 20 In addition, mixed-method studies were assessed using the criteria outlined by O'Cathain et al 21 and case studies using Stake's instrument outlined by Crowe et al 22 These instruments were also used in the South African review.…”
Section: N Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purpose of this review, we define clinical nursing research as research conducted at the individual patient or client level, which includes at least one patient-related outcome. One integrative review examined only cancer nursing research (Maree and Schmollgruber, 2014); the other reviewed all nursing research (including organizational, policy-driven or pedagogical), limiting the ability to identify gaps in current clinical nursing research (Adejumo and LekalakalaMokgele, 2009). A scoping review allows for the mapping of a broad spectrum of research and can be used to inform future research (Arksey and O'Malley, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the years 2000 to 2010 are seen as the period in which remarkable work was done in terms of research on the family caregiver of cancer patients (Fletcher, Miaskowski, Given, & Schumacher, ), the same trend does not apply to Africa, as families and caregivers are some of the under‐researched areas identified (Maree, Herbert, & Huiskamp, ; Maree & Schmollgruber, ; Molassiotis et al., ). Whether research from the developed world can inform Africa's cancer care providers is debatable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%