2018
DOI: 10.1108/lhtn-12-2017-0092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An integrative review of Web 3.0 in academic libraries

Abstract: 2018 AbstractPurpose -The aim of this paper is to present an integrated literature review exploring the nature of responsive, semantic and interactive Web 3.0 technologies applicable for academic libraries.Design/methodology/approach -We conducted an integrated review of the literature combining a strategy of automated and keywords search. The main source for identifying the studies are Emerald Library Studies and Information & Knowledge Management eJournals, Web of Knowledge, and Library, Information Science … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Preprints apparently add to the existing complexities in scholarly publishing; however, its plethora of models, scale, and form give rise to opportunities to embrace it on one hand and on the other hand may take time for mainstreaming in scholarly publishing [81][82][83][84][85]. Nonetheless, what constitutes them and whether they will stand out in the constructs of scholarly communication remains to be seen in the wake of diverse open data, open access-publishing models, open infrastructures, and web 3.0 technologies [86]. These factors are central for scholarly communication to enrich and strengthen scholarly web with search engines, indexing systems, semantic technologies, and social software analytics to maximize the research impact and build reputation systems through open infrastructures and metrics for authors and institutions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preprints apparently add to the existing complexities in scholarly publishing; however, its plethora of models, scale, and form give rise to opportunities to embrace it on one hand and on the other hand may take time for mainstreaming in scholarly publishing [81][82][83][84][85]. Nonetheless, what constitutes them and whether they will stand out in the constructs of scholarly communication remains to be seen in the wake of diverse open data, open access-publishing models, open infrastructures, and web 3.0 technologies [86]. These factors are central for scholarly communication to enrich and strengthen scholarly web with search engines, indexing systems, semantic technologies, and social software analytics to maximize the research impact and build reputation systems through open infrastructures and metrics for authors and institutions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the Industrial Age into the Information Age, wider accessibility has driven Library 2.0 toward the borderless library of Library 3.0, which exists independent of physical location (Peltier-Davis, 2009;Casey, 2006). Since 2006, Library 3.0 has been encouraged by the technological adoption of artificial intelligence, evident in the application of the semantic web, cloud computing and mobile devices, to offer information services based on users' implicit rather than explicit needs (Balaji et al, 2018;Kwanya et al, 2013). Therefore, both the role and function of librarians have to be calibrated to the specific information needs of users; for instance, librarians should have the ability to annotate and compare books and other information sources from a variety of perspectives instead of just to organize the library collections and resources from the linear perspective of supply and demand.…”
Section: Technology-pushmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por tanto, este trabajo supone un acercamiento de los fondos de las hemerotecas/ bibliotecas a la Web Semántica. Esta relación resulta esencial para organizar las bibliotecas, y sus recursos, como una red de datos (Balaji, et al, 2018) y es producto del proceso de evolución, acorde con la aparición de nuevos paradigmas, tendencias e influencias de orden tecnológico.…”
Section: Conclusiónunclassified