2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-023-08740-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An intelligent tuning scheme with a master/slave approach for efficient control of the automatic voltage regulator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the comparative assessment against the algorithms used in the above analyses, further comparisons were made with recently reported optimization techniques in the literature (See Table 11 ). This techniques include hybrid atom search particle swarm optimization (h-ASPSO) based PID controller [ 46 ], improved marine predators algorithm (MP-SEDA)-tuned FOPID controller [ 47 ], modified artificial bee colony (IABC) based LOA-FOPID [ 48 ], equilibrium optimizer (EO) based TI λ DND 2 N 2 [ 23 ], whale optimization algorithm (WOA) based PIDA [ 49 ], symbiotic organism search (SOS) algorithm-based PID-F controller [ 50 ], mayfly optimization algorithm based PI λ1 I λ2 D μ1 D μ2 controller [ 25 ], Levy flight improved Runge-Kutta optimizer (L-RUN) based PIDD 2 controller with master/slave approach [ 51 ], particle swarm optimization based 2DOF-PI controller with amplifier feedback [ 52 ], modified artificial rabbits optimizer (m-ARO) based FOPIDD 2 controller [ 53 ], genetic algorithm (GA) based fuzzy PID controller [ 54 ], sine-cosine algorithm (SCA) based FOPID controller with fractional filter [ 55 ], imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA) based gray PID controller [ 56 ], Rao algorithm based multi‐term FOPID controller [ 57 ], whale optimization algorithm (WOA) based 2DOF-FOPI [ 58 ], chaotic yellow saddle goatfish algorithm (C-YSGA) based FOPID controller [ 59 ] and crow search algorithm (CSA) based FOPI controller [ 31 ]. The results indicate that the QWGBO algorithm outperforms several state-of-the-art optimization methods, demonstrating its effectiveness in AVR system control.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In addition to the comparative assessment against the algorithms used in the above analyses, further comparisons were made with recently reported optimization techniques in the literature (See Table 11 ). This techniques include hybrid atom search particle swarm optimization (h-ASPSO) based PID controller [ 46 ], improved marine predators algorithm (MP-SEDA)-tuned FOPID controller [ 47 ], modified artificial bee colony (IABC) based LOA-FOPID [ 48 ], equilibrium optimizer (EO) based TI λ DND 2 N 2 [ 23 ], whale optimization algorithm (WOA) based PIDA [ 49 ], symbiotic organism search (SOS) algorithm-based PID-F controller [ 50 ], mayfly optimization algorithm based PI λ1 I λ2 D μ1 D μ2 controller [ 25 ], Levy flight improved Runge-Kutta optimizer (L-RUN) based PIDD 2 controller with master/slave approach [ 51 ], particle swarm optimization based 2DOF-PI controller with amplifier feedback [ 52 ], modified artificial rabbits optimizer (m-ARO) based FOPIDD 2 controller [ 53 ], genetic algorithm (GA) based fuzzy PID controller [ 54 ], sine-cosine algorithm (SCA) based FOPID controller with fractional filter [ 55 ], imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA) based gray PID controller [ 56 ], Rao algorithm based multi‐term FOPID controller [ 57 ], whale optimization algorithm (WOA) based 2DOF-FOPI [ 58 ], chaotic yellow saddle goatfish algorithm (C-YSGA) based FOPID controller [ 59 ] and crow search algorithm (CSA) based FOPI controller [ 31 ]. The results indicate that the QWGBO algorithm outperforms several state-of-the-art optimization methods, demonstrating its effectiveness in AVR system control.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate the proposed approach's superiority, extensive comparative analyses (statistical, boxplot, convergence profile, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, transient and frequency responses, performance against varying input reference and external load disturbance, controller effort and robustness) were conducted against other competitive algorithms and recently reported optimization techniques. In addition to the comparative assessment against the algorithms used in the above analyses, further comparisons were made with recently reported 17 optimization techniques in the literature [23,25,31,[46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59]. The simulation results unequivocally highlight the QWGBO algorithm's superior performance in optimizing the AVR system, as evident from lower objective function values, excellent convergence, and statistical assessments as well as stability and robustness analyses.…”
Section: Contributionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These controllers play a critical role in regulating and stabilizing the system voltage. The transfer functions of some of the most commonly reported controllers, cluding PID, PIDA, FOPID, PIDD 2 , and PIDND 2 N 2 , are, respectively, provided in Equ tions ( 34)- (38) [50,51]. In the context of the AVR system, several controller types have been reported and applied.…”
Section: Reported Controller Types and Pidnd 2 N 2 Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%