2005
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6750-5-15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An inter-platform repeatability study investigating real-time amplification of plasmid DNA

Abstract: Background: The wide variety of real-time amplification platforms currently available has determined that standardisation of DNA measurements is a fundamental aspect involved in the comparability of results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, using C T values for comparison of viral loads between studies might be misleading. 24,25 According to preliminary studies, short-term viremia and low viral loads complicate Zika virus detection in blood. 13,26 Since Zika virus RNA has been detected in urine from Zika virus-infected patients for two weeks or longer, 26 we investigated whether blood or urine were the most suitable clinical specimens for diagnoses of acute Zika virus infection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, using C T values for comparison of viral loads between studies might be misleading. 24,25 According to preliminary studies, short-term viremia and low viral loads complicate Zika virus detection in blood. 13,26 Since Zika virus RNA has been detected in urine from Zika virus-infected patients for two weeks or longer, 26 we investigated whether blood or urine were the most suitable clinical specimens for diagnoses of acute Zika virus infection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between in situ analysis and the archived samples was not due to a lower extraction efficiency of the MFB module compared to the benchtop extraction. Instead, the lower in situ values may be due to software or hardware differences in calculating cycle thresholds between the MFB and the laboratory based qPCR analysis, which impact qPCR standards and copy number estimates 17,18 . Alternatively, the difference could also be linked to the behavior of mackerel, which displayed strong semidiurnal migrations between the bottom and surface of the mesocosm, triggered by an artificial sunrise at 09:00 each day.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, low‐copy PCRs are stochastically limited, and LODs of <3 copies per PCR are reportedly not possible [Bustin et al, ]. Sensitivity and assay comparison are influenced by different real‐time PCR platforms and PCR primer pairs, detection chemistries, and plasmid DNA copy number used during quantitation [Donald et al, ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%