An interactional “live eye tracking” study in autism spectrum disorder: combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in the study of gaze

Dindar, Katja; Korkiakangas, Terhi; Laitila, Aarno; Kärnä, Eija

doi:10.1080/14780887.2017.1290174

Cited by 19 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 62 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Fifth, the stimuli used in the study involved dynamic, complex social situations, yet a passive third-person perspective typical of most structured test situations does not allow for the social participation inherent in real-life interactions. Examination of attention in reallife social interactions may therefore shed light on different aspects of visual social attention, in particular, how gaze is used in interaction (see, e.g., Dindar et al 2017;Gobel et al 2015;Hessels 2020), and may bring out perhaps different information on both competencies and challenges than found in the current study. In the future, such moment-level analyses of visual social attention in real-life interactions would be fruitful in increasing understanding of the role gaze plays in navigating pragmatically complex real-life interactions.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 78%

Social-Pragmatic Inferencing, Visual Social Attention and Physiological Reactivity to Complex Social Scenes in Autistic Young Adults

Dindar

Loukusa

Helminen

et al. 2021

J Autism Dev Disord

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study examined social-pragmatic inferencing, visual social attention and physiological reactivity to complex social scenes. Participants were autistic young adults (n = 14) and a control group of young adults (n = 14) without intellectual disability. Results indicate between-group differences in social-pragmatic inferencing, moment-level social attention and heart rate variability (HRV) reactivity. A key finding suggests associations between increased moment-level social attention to facial emotion expressions, better social-pragmatic inferencing and greater HRV suppression in autistic young adults. Supporting previous research, better social-pragmatic inferencing was found associated with less autistic traits.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 78%

Social-Pragmatic Inferencing, Visual Social Attention and Physiological Reactivity to Complex Social Scenes in Autistic Young Adults

Dindar

Loukusa

Helminen

et al. 2021

J Autism Dev Disord

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The data were collected in a live eye-tracking situation (e.g. Dindar et al, 2017;Korkiakangas, 2018) from two student dyads (one allmale, one all-female dyad) recruited from an initial teacher education programme in a Finnish university. The students knew each other before the recorded CPS session.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thus, event-related measures focussing on the interactional organisation of gaze are more informative about what makes some instances of gazing 'social' (e.g. Dindar, Korkiakangas, Laitila, & Kärnä, 2017;Korkiakangas, 2018;Tuononen, Korkiakangas, Laitila, & Kärnä, 2016).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Joint attention behaviour in remote collaborative problem solving: exploring different attentional levels in dyadic interaction

Pöysä-Tarhonen

Awwal

Häkkinen

et al. 2021

RPTEL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The current article describes an exploratory study that focussed on joint attention behaviour—the basis of interaction predicting productive collaboration—to better understand collaborative problem solving, particularly its social aspects during remote dyadic interaction. The study considered joint attention behaviour as a socio-linguistic phenomenon and relied on detailed qualitative interaction analysis on event-related measures of multiple observational data (i.e. log files, eye-tracking data). The aim was to illustrate and exemplify how the diverse attentional levels of joint attention behaviour (i.e. monitoring, common, mutual and shared attention) delineated by Siposova and Carpenter (Cognition 89:260–274, 2019) were achieved in remote collaborative problem solving in dyads, including the underlying basis of joint attention behaviour (i.e. individual attention experience). The results made visible the complex functioning of the social aspects of remote collaborative problem solving and provided preliminary insights into how the hierarchical and nested levels of ‘jointness’ and common knowledge were achieved in this context. The analysis reproduced all the theorised attentional levels as both isolated and parallel individualistic attention experiences whilst acknowledging the restrictions of the remote interaction environment and the specific task structures.

show abstract

“…During the most recent years, however, novel conversationanalytically informed research interests have emerged, which have also given rise to new types of theoretical and methodological challenges. On the one hand, contemporary measurement technologies such as motion capture (Edlund et al, 2013;Stevanovic et al, 2017) and eye-tracking (Dindar et al, 2017;Kendrick and Holler, 2017) have been seen as valuable tools to get detailed knowledge of participant behaviors. Using these technologies in a laboratory, however, involves a shift from naturally-occurring interactions toward more researchercontrolled realizations of the interactional encounters under investigation.…”

Section: Affective and Psychophysiological Underpinnings Of Social Inmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Psychophysiological Experience of Solving Moral Dilemmas Together: An Interdisciplinary Comparison Between Participants With and Without Depression

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dyads with a depressed and a non-depressed participant (N = 15) and two non-depressed participants (N = 15) discussed a moral dilemma, during which the participants’ gaze direction and skin conductance (SC) were measured. Partner gazing occurred most frequently when a speaker took a strong stance toward saving a person in the dilemma, depressed participants however looking at their co-participants less often than non-depressed participants. The participants’ SC response rates were higher during responsive utterances expressing disagreement (vs. agreement) with co-participant ideas or suggesting that a person be sacrificed (vs. saved). We argue that a better understanding of the affective corollaries of human social interaction necessitates a balanced consideration of both contents of talk and behavioral patterns.

show abstract

An interactional “live eye tracking” study in autism spectrum disorder: combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in the study of gaze

Cited by 19 publications

References 62 publications

Social-Pragmatic Inferencing, Visual Social Attention and Physiological Reactivity to Complex Social Scenes in Autistic Young Adults

Social-Pragmatic Inferencing, Visual Social Attention and Physiological Reactivity to Complex Social Scenes in Autistic Young Adults

Joint attention behaviour in remote collaborative problem solving: exploring different attentional levels in dyadic interaction

The Psychophysiological Experience of Solving Moral Dilemmas Together: An Interdisciplinary Comparison Between Participants With and Without Depression

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About