An interactive environment for managing detected data towards geriatric prevention

Urošević, Vladimir; Puppa, Paolo; Tatsiopoulos, Christos

doi:10.1109/rtsi.2017.8065968

Cited by 2 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Forty dashboards reporting incidences of health hazards or the magnitude of a crisis caused e.g., by natural disasters, use maps to visualize the spread or effected areas ( 45 ). These are often further enhanced by symbols ( 38 ) ( n = 5), icons ( 46 ) ( n = 6) or pop-ups ( 47 ) ( n = 11) that become visible when the users hover over the map.…”

Section: Results: Answering the Research Questionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Digital dashboards visualizing public health data: a systematic review

Schulze

Brand

Geppert

et al. 2023

Front. Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionPublic health is not only threatened by diseases, pandemics, or epidemics. It is also challenged by deficits in the communication of health information. The current COVID-19 pandemic demonstrates that impressively. One way to deliver scientific data such as epidemiological findings and forecasts on disease spread are dashboards. Considering the current relevance of dashboards for public risk and crisis communication, this systematic review examines the state of research on dashboards in the context of public health risks and diseases.MethodNine electronic databases where searched for peer-reviewed journal articles and conference proceedings. Included articles (n = 65) were screened and assessed by three independent reviewers. Through a methodological informed differentiation between descriptive studies and user studies, the review also assessed the quality of included user studies (n = 18) by use of the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).Results65 articles were assessed in regards to the public health issues addressed by the respective dashboards, as well as the data sources, functions and information visualizations employed by the different dashboards. Furthermore, the literature review sheds light on public health challenges and objectives and analyzes the extent to which user needs play a role in the development and evaluation of a dashboard. Overall, the literature review shows that studies that do not only describe the construction of a specific dashboard, but also evaluate its content in terms of different risk communication models or constructs (e.g., risk perception or health literacy) are comparatively rare. Furthermore, while some of the studies evaluate usability and corresponding metrics from the perspective of potential users, many of the studies are limited to a purely functionalistic evaluation of the dashboard by the respective development teams.ConclusionThe results suggest that applied research on public health intervention tools like dashboards would gain in complexity through a theory-based integration of user-specific risk information needs.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=200178, identifier: CRD42020200178.

show abstract

Section: Results: Answering the Research Questionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Digital dashboards visualizing public health data: a systematic review

Schulze

Brand

Geppert

et al. 2023

Front. Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…2 below, and progressing beyond the thoroughly analyzed key features of current relevant state-of-the-art ALS & MS management tools and applications like Emilyn 1 , Cleo 2 , and over 50 others relevant analyzed and compared in terms of specific features and functionalities. Some of the platform functionalities and architecture build and extend upon preceding and parallel related projects and initiatives tackling common issues and exploiting applicable methods in neurodegenerative progression management [7], well-being [8], functional decline prevention [9], and public health [4,5], such as PULSE 3 , City4Age 4 , NEVERMIND 5 , or VERITAS 6 .…”

Section: Introduction and Scientific/technological Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…6 https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/247765. Torino) have established extensive environmental sensing and measuring infrastructure, ingesting data both from public environmental measuring stations wherever open or available, as well as from connected IoT sensing devices deployed by BRAINTEASER and previous or parallel relevant projects like (again) PULSE, eMOTIONAL Cities 7 , Sharing Cities 8 , ACROSSING 9 and others [4][5][6], and complemented also with data from portable/wearable compact sensing devices (carried on or with patients) deployed by the project, mostly Atmotube PRO monitors 10 .…”

Section: Introduction and Scientific/technological Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%