1993
DOI: 10.1080/07494469300640301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An interactive experimental method for the determination of musical scales in oral cultures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature, Western scholars often discuss variation in intonation in societies that lack mathematical musical theory as being an intentional form of expression [64,68,[138][139][140][141], whereas studies of classical musics typically investigate to which theoretical tuning system the musicians conform [13,123,126,127]. Ultimately, it is difficult to intuit the differences between societies, since there are only a few cross-cultural studies of interval discrimination [142,143]. Here, we performed a preliminary study on intonation variability (S15, S16 Figs in S1 File), finding comparable levels of variation (with the possible exception of the pelog scale) in Gamelan orchestras, Thai xylophones, Turkish ney [91], Georgian singing [89], and a Belgian carillon [144].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, Western scholars often discuss variation in intonation in societies that lack mathematical musical theory as being an intentional form of expression [64,68,[138][139][140][141], whereas studies of classical musics typically investigate to which theoretical tuning system the musicians conform [13,123,126,127]. Ultimately, it is difficult to intuit the differences between societies, since there are only a few cross-cultural studies of interval discrimination [142,143]. Here, we performed a preliminary study on intonation variability (S15, S16 Figs in S1 File), finding comparable levels of variation (with the possible exception of the pelog scale) in Gamelan orchestras, Thai xylophones, Turkish ney [91], Georgian singing [89], and a Belgian carillon [144].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vida Chenoweth describes a music system of Gadsup people of New Guinea, in which pitches are all relative, whereas the intervals between them are constant (Chenoweth, 1966). Simha Arom reports of degree-based tonal organization in music of Aka Pygmies of Central Africa, governed by the order of the degrees, leaving the exact interval sizes unimportant (Arom & Fürniss, 1993). An example of a harmonic-interval-based music system is traditional Setu music of Lithuania and Siberia, where the symmetric tonal organization is determined by the vertical harmony of the major 3 rd (Ambrazevičius & Pärtlas, 2011).…”
Section: Modules Of Hearing As the Ultimate Music Competencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, when discussing intonation in societies without theoretical scales, tuning variation is often highlighted as an intrinsic part of that culture [44,48,[108][109][110]. There is indeed evidence that variability in tuning is intentional in some societies [107,109,111], and in other societies musicians may tolerate large deviations in their tunings [112], but it feels at times like there is an underlying assumption in the literature of differences between societies with established music theory, and those without. Unfortunately, we lack sufficient examples of instrument tunings from societies with theory scales for a thorough comparison, and microtonal deviations may have been airbrushed out of historical records due to the reliance on Western notation in transcription [113].…”
Section: How Different Are Scales?mentioning
confidence: 99%