2011
DOI: 10.1002/bmb.20523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An interactive modeling lesson increases students' understanding of ploidy during meiosis

Abstract: Chromosome structure is confusing to students at all levels, and chromosome behavior during meiosis is a notoriously difficult topic. Undergraduate biology majors are exposed to the process of meiosis numerous times during their presecondary and postsecondary education, yet understanding of key concepts, such as the point at which haploidy is established, does not improve substantially with repeated exposure. Based on student's drawings, 96% of intermediate-level biology majors have unclear or incorrect ideas … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
1
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
22
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In the work presented here, we delved deeper into students conceptual models and understanding of the molecular nature and behavior of chromosomes by investigating the elements and terminology that were used, or omitted, from their meiosis models (Figures 6 and 7). An interesting finding between the two analyses was that only 19% of individual students drew correct representations of chromosomes going through the process of meiosis in a preactivity assessment (Wright and Newman, 2011), whereas 85% of group models analyzed in this work were at least moderately correct (Table 2). It has been well documented in the literature that peer discussion improves performance on conceptual tasks (e.g., Smith et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the work presented here, we delved deeper into students conceptual models and understanding of the molecular nature and behavior of chromosomes by investigating the elements and terminology that were used, or omitted, from their meiosis models (Figures 6 and 7). An interesting finding between the two analyses was that only 19% of individual students drew correct representations of chromosomes going through the process of meiosis in a preactivity assessment (Wright and Newman, 2011), whereas 85% of group models analyzed in this work were at least moderately correct (Table 2). It has been well documented in the literature that peer discussion improves performance on conceptual tasks (e.g., Smith et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…A key feature of this work was that biology students were first primed for learning by creating their own models of meiosis using manipulative materials (Wright and Newman, 2011). In the activity that followed, instructors probed students about chromosomal structure at the molecular level, in order to help them make connections between structure and behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, misconceptions regarding the chromosome structure and genes may have impeded the understanding of heteroduplex formation and Holliday junction resolution. Students often fail to understand complex molecular processes because of misconceptions and gaps in their understanding of the basic chromosome structure and processes .…”
Section: Background and Purposementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computer‐assisted learning modules are likely more supportive of learning later in anatomy training when students are familiar with the materials, rather than as initial methods for learning content (Marsh et al, 2008; Wright and Newman, 2011). Careful design of anatomy materials for distance education, even if used as self‐directed adjuncts to face‐to‐face lectures, is necessary to enable successful learning outcomes (Smythe and Hughes, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%