An Interactive Workshop Reviewing Basic Biostatistics and Applying Bayes' Theorem to Diagnostic Testing and Clinical Decision-Making

Abstract

IntroductionSensitivity, specificity, and predictive values—the basic statistics behind using and interpreting screening and diagnostic tests—are taught in all medical schools, yet studies have shown that a majority of physicians cannot correctly define and apply these concepts. Previous work has not rigorously examined this disconnect and attempted to address it.MethodsWe used adult learning theory to design a case-based interactive workshop to review biostatistics and apply them to clinical decision-making using Bayes' theorem. Participants took an anonymous multiple-choice pretest, posttest, and delayed posttest on definitions and application of the concepts, and we compared the scores between the three tests. Several experiences with early iterations provided feedback to improve the workshop but were not included for analysis.ResultsWe conducted the finalized workshop with 54 pediatrics students, residents, and faculty. All learners completed the immediate pre- and posttests, and eight completed the delayed posttest. Average scores rose from 4.5/8 (56%) on the pretest to 6.5/8 (81%) on the posttest and 6.4/8 (80%) on the delayed posttest. Two-tailed t tests showed p < .001 for the difference between the pretest and both posttests, and post hoc power analysis showed a power of 99% to detect the observed differences. There was no significant difference (p = .8) between the posttest and delayed posttest.DiscussionOur work demonstrates that an interactive workshop reviewing basic biostatistics and teaching rational diagnostic testing using Bayes' theorem can be effective in connecting theoretical knowledge of biostatistics to evidence-based decision-making in real clinical practice.

A Guide to Basic Statistics for Educational Research

“…Another workshop in MedEdPORTAL contains an interactive review of basic biostatistics and discusses how to apply Bayes' theorem to testing and decision-making. 18 It uses a flipped classroom approach with quizzes to assess knowledge gained. Each of the three publications just described can aid educators in understanding basic statistical concepts, evidence-based medicine, and reading of the literature.…”

Numeracy Education for Health Care Providers: A Scoping Review

“…The length of the educational interventions in the reviewed studies ranged from a minimum of 2 hours for one half-day course 31 to a maximum of 230.5 hours over 6 years in one longitudinal course spanning the length of a medical school curriculum. 32 Many of the studies (n = 48, 68%) did not specify the number of teaching hours included in the educational intervention.…”

The Vanderbilt Nigeria Biostatistics Training Program (VN-BioStat): Results From a Skills Workshop

“…The sustainability of our capacity building effort is supported by our longstanding and highly successful research partnership with the Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital (AKTH) and Bayero University Kano (BUK) in Kano, Nigeria. It has been shown by others that interactive workshops that review fundamental biostatistics concepts and theorems effectively bridge the gap between biostatistics theory and evidence-based decision-making for clinicians (Nelson 2018). We will consider expanding future workshop slots to include clinician scientists from our partner institutions who express an interest in biostatistics.…”