2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.marchem.2003.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An intercomparison of HPLC phytoplankton pigment methods using in situ samples: application to remote sensing and database activities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
69
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
69
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Total phytoplankton biomass and the contribution of the different algal groups were achieved by HPLC analysis of marker pigments. It was demonstrated that the accuracy of Chla and chemotaxonomic carotenoid quantification by HPLC is less than 10 and 25%, respectively (Claustre et al, 2004). Data were subsequently processed with CHEMTAX (for CHEmical TAXonomy) (Mackey et al, 1996), as described in Descy et al (2005) and Sarmento et al (2006).…”
Section: Phytoplankton Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total phytoplankton biomass and the contribution of the different algal groups were achieved by HPLC analysis of marker pigments. It was demonstrated that the accuracy of Chla and chemotaxonomic carotenoid quantification by HPLC is less than 10 and 25%, respectively (Claustre et al, 2004). Data were subsequently processed with CHEMTAX (for CHEmical TAXonomy) (Mackey et al, 1996), as described in Descy et al (2005) and Sarmento et al (2006).…”
Section: Phytoplankton Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different phytoplankton groups contain diverse sets of light-absorbing pigments in addition to Chl (25,27,28). Light absorption is also influenced by the manner in which pigments are arranged or "packaged" within the phytoplankton (29).…”
Section: Absorption Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, the objective of P equal to 0.5 would require bias values of approximately 2%. Considering uncertainties on chl-a in situ data (Claustre et al 2004), results of algorithms evaluations (Brewin et al 2015), chl-a satellite products validation analyses (Gregg and Casey 2004;Mélin, Zibordi, and Berthon 2007) or inter-comparison Mélin 2010, and Figure 2(a)), uncertainties associated with the satellite-derived remote-sensing reflectance (Mélin and Franz 2014), and limitations inherent to the calibration of radiometers in space (Zibordi et al 2015), it is unlikely that, in the current state of technology and algorithm development, these levels of biases will be achieved by merely applying a fully consistent processing chain for the various missions (even though this is highly desirable). This study suggests that bias correction methods should become an integral part of the strategy to create ocean colour multi-mission CDRs.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%