2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An interdisciplinary computational model for predicting traumatic brain injury: Linking biomechanics and functional neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our KM methodology was largely inspired by Cabral et al, 2011 ., who used KMs in conjunction with the Balloon-Windkessel (BW) model to simulate functional connectivity, optimizing the model parameters to match the measured functional connectivity in a human subject. One difference in our approach was using a model that did not include signal latency among brain areas, an approximation that allowed us to model the dynamics across a far larger number of architectures than previously examined by Cabral or others ( Petkoski and Jirsa, 2019 ; Wu et al, 2022a ). Such a method more closely matched the KM from Allegra Mascaro et al, 2020 that assumed instantaneous coupling between oscillators albeit at low frequencies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our KM methodology was largely inspired by Cabral et al, 2011 ., who used KMs in conjunction with the Balloon-Windkessel (BW) model to simulate functional connectivity, optimizing the model parameters to match the measured functional connectivity in a human subject. One difference in our approach was using a model that did not include signal latency among brain areas, an approximation that allowed us to model the dynamics across a far larger number of architectures than previously examined by Cabral or others ( Petkoski and Jirsa, 2019 ; Wu et al, 2022a ). Such a method more closely matched the KM from Allegra Mascaro et al, 2020 that assumed instantaneous coupling between oscillators albeit at low frequencies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The archetype to explore the synchronization of a system is the Kuramoto model [19], which describes a set of coupled oscillators that interact through a sinusoidal function. Although its simplicity, the Kuramoto model provides a phenomenological description of the problem displaying rich emergent dynamics such as the phase transition from incoherence to synchrony [20][21][22], and provides insight into synchronization process in nature [23][24][25][26]. The Kuramoto model has been widely studied and its variations include the presence of noise [27,28], inertia [29][30][31], weighted coupling [32][33][34], time delay [35,36], resetting [37][38][39], among many others [4,21,22,40,41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers have investigated synchronization process in systems that are exposed to severe damage, which implies removing some components of the system. In network science, this effect is modeled with the complete removal of particular groups of links or nodes [26,[50][51][52][53][54][55], where the percolation connectivity threshold defines the limit of the global functionality of the system. Furthermore, different authors have explored synchronization in time-varying topologies with modifications in the network structure occurring at a temporal scale comparable to the characteristic time scale of synchronization [56][57][58][59][60].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%