2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2020.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Interdisciplinary Perspective from the Earth Scientist’s Periodic Table: Similarity and Connection between Geochemistry and Metallurgy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, it indicated that Ce­(III) has a high affinity to SO 4 2– , while transition metals (Me­(II)) are inclined to be bound with O 2– . Elemental affinity in geochemistry is associated with element migration in metallurgy . In geochemistry, ionic potential ( z / r ) discriminates the ability of ions to attract valence electrons, and electronegativity (χ) indicates the degree of electron transfer between two reactants .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accordingly, it indicated that Ce­(III) has a high affinity to SO 4 2– , while transition metals (Me­(II)) are inclined to be bound with O 2– . Elemental affinity in geochemistry is associated with element migration in metallurgy . In geochemistry, ionic potential ( z / r ) discriminates the ability of ions to attract valence electrons, and electronegativity (χ) indicates the degree of electron transfer between two reactants .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elemental affinity in geochemistry is associated with element migration in metallurgy. 69 In geochemistry, ionic potential (z/r) discriminates the ability of ions to attract valence electrons, and electronegativity (χ) indicates the degree of electron transfer between two reactants. 70 In HSAB theory, the cation with the higher ionic potential and lower electronegativity could be classified as the hard acid, while the reverse is true for soft acid.…”
Section: Theoretical Perspective Of the Sulfationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This tendency is in accordance with the orthogonal experimental results that calcinating temperature plays the primary role in mineral transformation, and higher temperature is beneficial to the Ce recovery with low Fe and Mn leaching concentration. According to the geochemical and metallurgical principle, both Mn and Fe are classified as the chalcophile elements that have a strong affinity with S. In general, the higher ionic potential of Mn­(IV) ( z / r = 8) results in a priority to the reduction of MnO 2 by S than that of Fe 2 O 3 (Fe­(III), z / r = 5) and CeO 2 (Ce­(IV), z / r = 5), as well as other components (Al­(III), z / r = 6; Ca­(II), z / r = 2). Similar transformation processes were also reported in the recovery of Ni over Fe 2 O 3 from iron-rich nickeliferous lateritic ores, in which Fe 2 O 3 was first reduced over NiO (Ni­(II) z / r = 3) to form FeS 2 and then facilitated the reduction of NiO as metallic Ni for further recovery .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This tendency is in accordance with the orthogonal experimental results that calcinating temperature plays the primary role in mineral transformation, and higher temperature is beneficial to the Ce recovery with low Fe and Mn leaching concentration. According to the geochemical and metallurgical principle, 35 both Mn and Fe are classified as the chalcophile elements that have a strong affinity with S. In general, the higher ionic potential of Mn(IV) (z/r = 8) results in a priority to the reduction of MnO 2 by S than that of first reduced over NiO (Ni(II) z/r = 3) to form FeS 2 and then facilitated the reduction of NiO as metallic Ni for further recovery. 36 Such an order of prioritizing reduction process may benefit to MnO 2 reduction despite the much lower content of MnO 2 (0.14 wt %) than Fe 2 O 3 (5.28 wt %) in the tailings.…”
Section: Effects On Ceomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As +3 /As +5 are both large, polarisable ions. They are soft cations and should bind well to soft donors like S −2 explaining the different sulfide minerals species that are formed in the leaching with Na 2 S – NaOH, Sun and Zhao (2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%