2011 15th Annual International Symposium on Wearable Computers 2011
DOI: 10.1109/iswc.2011.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Interdisciplinary Undergraduate Design Course for Wearable and Pervasive Computing Products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In sum, the qualitative data indicated that the teams under the balanced condition showed higher effectiveness than the teams under the non-balanced condition. This was also confirmed from a quantitative measurement of team effectiveness, the Team Diagnostic Survey (Martin, Kim, Forsyth, McNair, Coupey, & Dorsa, 2011).…”
Section: Team Effectiveness: Observation and Final Productsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…In sum, the qualitative data indicated that the teams under the balanced condition showed higher effectiveness than the teams under the non-balanced condition. This was also confirmed from a quantitative measurement of team effectiveness, the Team Diagnostic Survey (Martin, Kim, Forsyth, McNair, Coupey, & Dorsa, 2011).…”
Section: Team Effectiveness: Observation and Final Productsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The deeply disciplinary nature of universities does not prepare students for working on the types of design teams that are required for successful wearable computing systems. " [35].…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• E-Textiles and making as Democratization of Technology [7-9, 39, 44] • Wearable Technology as Transdisciplinary Research [22,35,55] • Case Studies, Frameworks, and Performance [13,57,59] • Privacy and Security [12,26,32,38,52] • Policy and Law [1,2] • The Future [10,14,20,53]…”
Section: Readings and Course Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, while previous studies indicate that interdisciplinary faculty teams are a key component in building students' interdisciplinary capacity [5,6,8], our experiences in this course suggest that too many faculty can potentially counter those gains by creating a sense of fracturing rather than integrating -particularly in the 3-credit course, which, as noted earlier, was open to a wider audience. Too many faculty members may create unmanageable complexity.…”
Section: For Interdisciplinary Programsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Following previous studies highlighting the importance of interdisciplinary teaching teams to foster interdisciplinary learning [5,6,8,9], both courses were taught by six faculty members (including Authors 2, 3, and 4) representing engineering, the sciences, business, and urban affairs and planning. (Note that to avoid concerns about influence over grades, Author 2 helped organize the course, but did not participate in any grading of student work, in accordance with the IRB-approved research protocol; Authors 3 and 4 did not participate in the research component until the course was completed, and do not have access to participant identities).…”
Section: Course Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%