2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2006.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An interface capturing method for free-surface hydrodynamic flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
160
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
160
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1-3, respectively. They are written for the incompressible flow of viscous fluid [20]. The mass conservation gains the following form when incompressible phases with constant densities of the distinct phases are considered and when the so-called space conservation law is satisfied in the case of a moving grid [20].…”
Section: Flow Solvermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1-3, respectively. They are written for the incompressible flow of viscous fluid [20]. The mass conservation gains the following form when incompressible phases with constant densities of the distinct phases are considered and when the so-called space conservation law is satisfied in the case of a moving grid [20].…”
Section: Flow Solvermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, second-order discretisation schemes were chosen for the user-defined options: a second-order backward scheme for the time derivatives [20], the gamma differencing scheme (GDS) for the convective terms of momentum and turbulence equations [20], and the blended reconstructed interface capturing scheme (BRICS) for the convective term of the volume fraction conservation equation [22].…”
Section: Flow Solvermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A practical consequence of numerical gradient evaluation for a step-function is the parasitic velocity at the interface. Quetey et al [3] take into account the discontinuities at the free surface within the FVM, assuming that the free surface always coincides with the mesh faces. Such an approach requires significant mesh refinement at the free surface.…”
Section: Interface Jump Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The oldest and still the most popular methods use a fixed mesh to solve a single set of governing equations for the whole fluid flow, with different approaches to locating the interface between the phases. Among the many methods which belong to this category, one may mention the marker-and-cell method (MAC) [1,2], the volume of fluid method (VOF) [3][4][5], the level set method [6,7], the ghost fluid method [8] and a group of front tracking methods [9,10]. These methods are particularly attractive due to straight-forward handling of large deformation and changing topology of the interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%