2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2018.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An interfacial statistical associating fluid theory (iSAFT) approach for surface/interfacial tension predictions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the slope changes from about −0.10 to −0.07 mN/(m K) in the pressure range 30-100 MPa (Figure S3). These results are consistent with other theoretical [75][76][77] and simulation 52,[78][79][80] studies.…”
Section: Decane+water Systemsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…For instance, the slope changes from about −0.10 to −0.07 mN/(m K) in the pressure range 30-100 MPa (Figure S3). These results are consistent with other theoretical [75][76][77] and simulation 52,[78][79][80] studies.…”
Section: Decane+water Systemsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, the agreement is poor, for example, at low temperatures, because the simulated density profile of decane shows artificial oscillations as described above. In general, for all systems, decane has a negative surface excess due to unfavorable hydrophilic–hydrophobic interactions between H 2 O and decane. , The increase in IFT with pressure is attributed to the negative surface excess of decane (see eq and Figure ). This surface excess was found to decrease with temperature at a fixed pressure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…51 Later, Sauer and Gross 36 adopted the previously mentioned approach and treated λ as an adjustable parameter and showed that it can be treated as a unique parameter for all compounds they studied. They proposed two dierent dispersion functionals based on WDA, one of which slightly dierent than the one proposed by Shen et al 31 More recently, Wang et al 37 proposed a functional also using the PC-SAFT dispersion term in the functional form, and treat it locally together with the weighted densities dened in mFMT in order to account for short range interactions. The long range interactions are included in a non-local functional.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned before, in the bulk limit where the local particle density tends to the bulk density, the DFT implementations reduce to the bulk equation of state used to define the free energy functional. The most relevant examples of these implementations are SAFT with potential of variable range (SAFT-VR), interfacial SAFT (iSAFT), the perturbed-chain SAFT (PC-SAFT), most recently SAFT-γ, and the work of Wu et al In general, all implementations are in good agreement with molecular simulations of hard sphere fluids thanks to the very successful fundamental measure theory (FMT) originally from Rosenfeld, and later modified simultaneously by Yu and Wu (mFMT) and Roth et al (White Bear FMT) . The contribution due to chain formation is usually computed according to Tripathi and Chapman, or with the term derived by Yu and Wu that makes use of weighted densities defined in mFMT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%