2014
DOI: 10.1080/10556788.2013.858156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An interior point method for nonlinear programming with infeasibility detection capabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possibility is to introduce slack variables to inequality constraints and apply augmented Lagrangian method in the case of simple bounds as in [5]. On the other hand, we note that infeasibility detection has been used in the framework of interior point methods [24,25]. However, these works did not report complete global and local convergence analyses of their methods, despite good numerical results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…One possibility is to introduce slack variables to inequality constraints and apply augmented Lagrangian method in the case of simple bounds as in [5]. On the other hand, we note that infeasibility detection has been used in the framework of interior point methods [24,25]. However, these works did not report complete global and local convergence analyses of their methods, despite good numerical results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The interior-point approach has been shown to be robust and efficient in solving linear and nonlinear programs (for example, see [2,3,9,10,13], [14]- [22] and [24,26,27,30,31,32,34,35]. Among all interior-point methods, the primal-dual interior-point methods have drawn considerable attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods can roughly and mainly be summarized into three kinds by the order of using the penalty technique. The first kind of methods firstly reformulate the original program to a problem with only equality constraints by interior barrier technique and then prompt the global convergence of these methods by different penalty functions, such as [9,10,13], [18]- [21], [24,26,27,30]. The second kind of methods first use the penalty strategy to obtain a new formulation of the original program with only inequality constraints and then use the interiorpoint methods to solve the formulation, such as [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of all the methods of this kind, the step-decomposition approaches, which splits the total step into a normal step and a tangential step, and which integrates ideas of interior point methods and Byrd-Omojokun's trust region idea [3,19], have been proven practical. Two nice features of this strategy is the consistent subproblems and the capacity of infeasibility detection [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Lemma 3.1, (12), (18) and (25) are used. Since α k ≥ 0.5α h k , where α h k given by (39), the previous inequalities give…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%