1998
DOI: 10.1109/59.708745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An interior point nonlinear programming for optimal power flow problems with a novel data structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 332 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
24
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2 shows that the complementary gap is gradually reduced until it becomes less than the tolerance. The centering parameter [16] of the NIPM is set to 0.1, and hence, we can expect the complementary gap to reduce by 90%. Figure 3 shows that in the initial part of the solution process, the maximum mismatch is dramatically reduced below the solution tolerance, but in further iteration, the maximum mismatch increases to Figure 4 shows the change in the active power loss during the solution iteration.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 2 shows that the complementary gap is gradually reduced until it becomes less than the tolerance. The centering parameter [16] of the NIPM is set to 0.1, and hence, we can expect the complementary gap to reduce by 90%. Figure 3 shows that in the initial part of the solution process, the maximum mismatch is dramatically reduced below the solution tolerance, but in further iteration, the maximum mismatch increases to Figure 4 shows the change in the active power loss during the solution iteration.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the result, an optimization problem with complementarity conditions was envisaged to be reformulated into a multi-objective optimization problem. For practical NIPM applications, a set of reduced correction equations is usually adopted, including the Hessian term and the Jacobian sub-matrix, only for the equality constraints [16,17]. Thus, if the equality formulation of (1) is added to the NIPM formulation, the system size of the correction equations must be increased; hence, a certain amount of effort is required for modification of the CC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonlinear programming is a very common issue in the operation of power systems, including reactive power optimization (RPO) [1], unit commitment (UC) [2], economic dispatch (ED) [3]. In order to tackle this issue, several optimization approaches have been adopted, such as the Newton method [4], quadratic programming [5], interior-point method [6]. However, these methods are essentially gradient-based mathematic optimization methods, which highly depend on an accurate system model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional analytical methods include gradient descent, interior point methods, quadratic programming, etc. However, due to the nonconvexity of power flow equations, these traditional methods can only guarantee a local optimal solution [13]. Thus, convex programming methods are more desirable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%