2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11081-012-9192-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An interior point technique for solving bilevel programming problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where δ k > 0 is the radius of the trust-region. To evaluate the trial step d k , any approximation to the solution of the above Subproblem (12) can be used as long as a fraction of the Cauchy decrease condition holds. The fraction of the Cauchy decrease condition is the condition that a fraction of the predicted decrease obtained by the Cauchy step is less than or equal to the predicted decrease obtained by d k .…”
Section: Outline Of Pbtr Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where δ k > 0 is the radius of the trust-region. To evaluate the trial step d k , any approximation to the solution of the above Subproblem (12) can be used as long as a fraction of the Cauchy decrease condition holds. The fraction of the Cauchy decrease condition is the condition that a fraction of the predicted decrease obtained by the Cauchy step is less than or equal to the predicted decrease obtained by d k .…”
Section: Outline Of Pbtr Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fraction of the Cauchy decrease condition is the condition that a fraction of the predicted decrease obtained by the Cauchy step is less than or equal to the predicted decrease obtained by d k . Therefore, a conjugate gradient method [35] is used to solve the Subproblem (12). In the following Algorithm 1, the main steps to solve Subproblem (12) are offered.…”
Section: Outline Of Pbtr Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, this problem is nonconvex. Therefore, there is no guarantee on the optimality of solution [15], and methods developed to solve nonlinear problems based on KKT conditions may face difficulties when directly applied to solve MPECs [39]. Nevertheless, algorithms and solution methods have been developed to deal with these difficulties [40][41][42][43][44][45][46].…”
Section: Mathematical Program With Equilibrium Constraints (Mpec)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problem (1.1) has a wide range of applications in engineering; to have a flavour of this, see, e.g., [7] and references therein. One of the most common single-level transformation of problem (1.1) is the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) reformulation, which consists of replacing inclusion y ∈ S(x) with the equivalent KKT conditions of the lower-level problem, under appropriate assumptions; see, e.g., [1,8,5,15,24]. As shown in [5], the first drawback of the KKT reformulation is that it is not necessarily equivalent to the original problem (1.1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%