2014
DOI: 10.4304/jltr.5.3.642-653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Interlanguage Pragmatic Study on Chinese EFL Learners’ Refusal: Perception and Performance

Abstract: Abstract-Refusals have been widely examined across languages in the literature. However, few attempts have been made to elicit both perception and performance data for method-triangulation. In addition, Chinese EFL learners' refusals are relatively less investigated. The present study aims to bridge this gap and has two major purposes. One is to examine the cross-cultural differences between Chinese and English refusals. The other is to study how Chinese EFL learners perceive and perform the speech act of refu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
8
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As was observed to be the case with the suggestion scenarios, males and females favoured direct and explicit strategies more than any other category when refusing. These findings are contrary to those of Lin (2014), whose Chinese EFL and American NSE participants tended to use direct strategies least when refusing.…”
Section: Third Research Questioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…As was observed to be the case with the suggestion scenarios, males and females favoured direct and explicit strategies more than any other category when refusing. These findings are contrary to those of Lin (2014), whose Chinese EFL and American NSE participants tended to use direct strategies least when refusing.…”
Section: Third Research Questioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…The number of studies with relevant data is quite limited. Most of the studies either combine all the semantic formulas (Keshavarz, Eslami & Ghahreman 2006;Hosseini & Talebinezhad 2014;Izadi & Zilaie 2014;Lin 2014) or do not categorize the data based on the situation of an invitation with the appropriate variable of social status (Chen, Ye & Zhang 1995;Liao & Bresnahan 1996;Beckers 1999;Chang 2009;Sahragard & Javanmardi 2011;Ghazanfari, Bonyadi & Malekzadeh 2013;Farashaiyanl & Muthusamy 2017). Given these reasons, the studies for this research are carefully selected, considering their relevance and representativeness.…”
Section: Semantic Formula In Refusal Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) or the comparative studies which compare the production of this speech act by the speakers of different languages (Beebe, Takahashi, and Uliss-Weltz, 1990;Lin, 2014;Tsuiki Moaveni, 2014;Kwon, 2004;Kazemi Gol, 2013;etc. ).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In his study, Lin (2014) examined the cross-cultural differences between Chinese and English refusals, and how Chinese EFL learners perceive and perform the speech act of IJALEL 6(7): [180][181][182][183][184][185][186][187][188][189][190][191] refusal. The data were collected from 30 native speakers of Mandarin Chinese in Taiwan (NSC), 30 Chinese EFL learners in Taiwan (EFL), and 30 native speakers of American English in America (NSE).…”
Section: Studies On the Use Of Refusal By English Learners Of Other Lmentioning
confidence: 99%