2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2017.10.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An internally consistent pressure calibration of geobarometers applicable to the Earth’s upper mantle using in situ XRD

Abstract: We have performed an experimental cross calibration of a suite of mineral equilibria within mantle rock bulk compositions that are commonly used in geobarometry to determine the equilibration depths of upper mantle assemblages. Multiple barometers were compared simultaneously in experimental runs, where the pressure was determined using in-situ measurements of the unit cell volumes of MgO, NaCl, Re and h-BN between 3.6 and 10.4 GPa, and 1250 and 1500 �C. The experiments were performed in a large volume press (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kusaba et al (1999) did not specify uncertainty for their values, so we adopted a value for s(P Kusaba ) of 0.2 GPa. This is comparable to uncertainty estimates of pressure calculated using in situ diffraction in comparable experiments (Beyer et al, 2018), although uncertainty in pressure and temperature measured by in situ diffraction in DIA-type multi-anvil apparatus can be greater than this (Farmer et al, 2020).…”
Section: Fitting Phase Equilibrium Results To the Thermodynamic Modelsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Kusaba et al (1999) did not specify uncertainty for their values, so we adopted a value for s(P Kusaba ) of 0.2 GPa. This is comparable to uncertainty estimates of pressure calculated using in situ diffraction in comparable experiments (Beyer et al, 2018), although uncertainty in pressure and temperature measured by in situ diffraction in DIA-type multi-anvil apparatus can be greater than this (Farmer et al, 2020).…”
Section: Fitting Phase Equilibrium Results To the Thermodynamic Modelsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…(2) Three majorite barometers of Collerson et al (2010), Wijbrans et al (2016), and Beyer and Frost (2017) were used to calculate the pressures, and compared with the experimental pressures. In most of the experiments, the calculated pressures with these barometers are within ±(1–1.5) GPa of the nominal run pressures, except for systematic underestimation of pressures for experiments conducted at 20 GPa (Figure S4), while the corrected Collerson barometer (Beyer et al, 2018; Collerson et al, 2010) can produce pressures within ±(1–1.5) GPa of the run pressures for experiments carried out at 20 GPa, except for one (R1008B). (3) The calculated pressures using these majoritic barometers produce a systematic trend, which are in accordance with previous studies of Kiseeva, Litasov, et al (2013) and Thomson et al (2016) (Figure S4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Such refinement may be realized through experiments equilibrating rock salt + wurtzite assemblages with the pressure independently determined using in situ X-ray diffraction (e.g. Beyer et al, 2018). Confirmation of the pressure and temperature of the wz-rs univariant transition in endmember ZnO through in situ monitoring would also be most valuable, as the calibration of Farmer and O'Neill (2023) is quite sensitive to their selection of the results of Kusaba et al (1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%