2012
DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmr098
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An international comparative family medicine study of the Transition Project data from the Netherlands, Malta and Serbia. Is family medicine an international discipline? Comparing incidence and prevalence rates of reasons for encounter and diagnostic titles of episodes of care across populations

Abstract: Data that are collected with an episode-based model define incidence and prevalence rates much more precisely. Incidence and prevalence rates reflect the content of the doctor-patient encounter in FM but only from a superficial perspective. However, we found evidence of an international FM core content and a local FM content reflected by important similarities in such distributions. FM is a complex discipline, and the reduction of the content of a consultation into one or more medical diagnoses, ignoring the p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
52
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…5 The duration of selected EoCs was calculated using the standard approach in the Episodes of Care in Family Practice (EFP) program, 9 but using a more recent database. The EoCs analysed in Table 1 were selected as examples of acute and chronic conditions, and the trends observed are typical of other acute and chronic conditions in the database (data available in EFP).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…5 The duration of selected EoCs was calculated using the standard approach in the Episodes of Care in Family Practice (EFP) program, 9 but using a more recent database. The EoCs analysed in Table 1 were selected as examples of acute and chronic conditions, and the trends observed are typical of other acute and chronic conditions in the database (data available in EFP).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2 gives the incidence to prevalence rate ratio for the 20 most common distributions of EoCs in the three populations. 5 Mean incidence to prevalence rate ratios ranged from 9.0% (for complicated hypertension, K87) to 85.7% (for excessive ear wax, H81, and gastroenteritis, D87), but some ratios lay outside even this wide range, in one or more populations. Health problems classically described as chronic had lower incidence to prevalence rate ratios, both in individual populations and on average: 11.8% for uncomplicated hypertension (K86, unweighted mean of three populations), 15.0% for type II diabetes mellitus (T90, 15 the ratio of incident to prevalent episodes of care for that ICPC code in each population, and the mean incidence to prevalence ratio in the three populations (un-weighted mean of previous three columns).…”
Section: Ethical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations