2006
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kel025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An international consensus survey of the diagnostic criteria for juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM)

Abstract: This process identified nine criteria that clinicians felt to be helpful or important in the diagnosis of JDM. A further process of refinement and validation is necessary to agree an internationally acceptable, clinically usable set of diagnostic criteria.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
86
1
8

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
5
86
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The diagnosis of JDM is probable if rash is present plus two of the other four criteria are present and definite in the presence of rash and three out of the other four criteria. In an international survey of paediatric rheumatologists published in 2006, clinical manifestations (proximal muscle weakness and characteristic skin rash) and laboratory findings (muscle enzymes) were routinely used in the diagnosis of JDM, while magnetic resonance (MRI) was also deemed important and used by 60% of responders to detect inflammatory muscular changes [34]. Muscle biopsy and EMG were used only by 61.3% and 55.5% [34], respectively, suggesting for the first time that a number of children would fail to meet the current diagnostic criteria necessary for the inclusion in research and other collaborative studies.…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Juvenile Dermatomyositismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnosis of JDM is probable if rash is present plus two of the other four criteria are present and definite in the presence of rash and three out of the other four criteria. In an international survey of paediatric rheumatologists published in 2006, clinical manifestations (proximal muscle weakness and characteristic skin rash) and laboratory findings (muscle enzymes) were routinely used in the diagnosis of JDM, while magnetic resonance (MRI) was also deemed important and used by 60% of responders to detect inflammatory muscular changes [34]. Muscle biopsy and EMG were used only by 61.3% and 55.5% [34], respectively, suggesting for the first time that a number of children would fail to meet the current diagnostic criteria necessary for the inclusion in research and other collaborative studies.…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Juvenile Dermatomyositismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between June 2012 and January 2014, children, adolescents and young adults (ages 2-21 years) with a diagnosis of probable or definite juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) (as determined by Bohan and Peter [3][4][5] criteria), overlap myositis or polymyositis, were recruited from the pediatric rheumatology clinic and were included regardless of their level of disease activity. After receiving approval from the institutional review board, one of three board-certified pediatric rheumatologists performed a complete evaluation of each patient.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnosis of JDM is based on the modified criteria of Bohan and Peter [3][4][5]. Although these criteria do not include imaging studies, MRI has been validated as an accurate indicator of muscle edema and active disease [6,7] and is typically incorporated into the diagnostic workup of children with suspected myositis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the criteria for diagnosis still used for many studies are still those of Bohan and Peter Peter, 1975a, 1975b] these criteria have been shown to be no longer reflective of Juvenile dermatomyositis: new insights and new treatment strategies modern day paediatric practice, since many paediatricians do not choose to perform electromyography on children, and some centres no longer routinely perform muscle biopsy [Brown et al 2006]. Clinical examination should include formal assessment of muscle strength using a validated tool, such as the Childhood Myositis Assessment Scale (CMAS) or manual muscle testing of the standardized eight groups of muscles (MMT8) [Huber, 2010;Huber et al 2004;Lovell et al 1999].…”
Section: Assessment Of Suspected Cases Of Juvenile Inflammatory Myositismentioning
confidence: 99%