2001
DOI: 10.1108/eum0000000006044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An international investigation of cultural and demographic effects on domestic retail loyalty

Abstract: Noting the lack of research on cultural effects on retailing, the present study uses the cultural framework developed by Hofstede as the foundation for an investigation of loyalty to domestic retailers. A multi-country survey of consumer attitudes about domestic versus international retailers explored the effects of two cultural variables (individualism and uncertainty avoidance), two individual-level demographic variables (age and sex), and one country-level demographic variable (the ratio of imports to GDP).… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
50
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The goal of a loyalty program is to establish a higher level of customer retention in profitable segments by providing more satisfaction and value to certain customers (Bolton et al 2000).There are various views about the effectiveness of loyalty programs (Yi and Jeon 2003). This is because the three determinants of retail loyalty have been recognised as individual characteristics, merchandise characteristics and service/interaction characteristics (Straughan and Albers-Miller 2001). Although the stated aim of most schemes is to reward loyal customers, the fundamental aim of most schemes is to manipulate consumer behaviour within this sophisticated system, where incentives and coupons can be individually targeted, in order to encourage customers to try new products or brands; increase multi-pack purchases; pay premium prices, and/or use the brand for increasingly diverse services (O'Malley 1998).…”
Section: Retail Network Operations and Customer Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of a loyalty program is to establish a higher level of customer retention in profitable segments by providing more satisfaction and value to certain customers (Bolton et al 2000).There are various views about the effectiveness of loyalty programs (Yi and Jeon 2003). This is because the three determinants of retail loyalty have been recognised as individual characteristics, merchandise characteristics and service/interaction characteristics (Straughan and Albers-Miller 2001). Although the stated aim of most schemes is to reward loyal customers, the fundamental aim of most schemes is to manipulate consumer behaviour within this sophisticated system, where incentives and coupons can be individually targeted, in order to encourage customers to try new products or brands; increase multi-pack purchases; pay premium prices, and/or use the brand for increasingly diverse services (O'Malley 1998).…”
Section: Retail Network Operations and Customer Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Straughan and Albers-Miller (2001) reported that cultural individualism is negatively correlated with loyalty to domestic retailers, while uncertainty avoidance is positively correlated to loyalty. Kivetz and Simonson (2003) point out the importance of individual differences and cultural norms (e.g., demographics, need for achievement, sensitivity to social comparisons, need for cognition) in the selection of types of reward benefits.…”
Section: The Cultural Influence On Loyalty Schemes: the Case Of Asianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past research also suggests that elderly people are less involved in purchasing than younger consumers. They exhibit more routine purchasing behavior, and are less willing to accept new ideas and uncertainty (Straughan and Albers-Miller 2001). Although older consumers economize more than younger shoppers (Zeithaml 1985), they make fewer price comparisons, seek less information, and prefer long-established brands (Lambert-Pandraud, Laurent, and Lapersonne 2005;Walsh and Mitchell 2005).…”
Section: Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%